Translation using google translate on the image:
At the moment, Ukrainian formations have made another attempt at a massive strike on the Crimean peninsula.
To carry out strikes, both UAVs are used to destroy ground targets, and unmanned boats are used to attack ships of the Black Sea Fleet. Another goal is the Crimean Bridge.
Judging by the explosions in the vicinity of Feodosia, one of the targets could have been the patrol boat "Sergei Kotov", which was in that area. It is unknown whether there were hits or whether explosions occurred as a result of the destruction of the BECs.
I think your link is missing buddy.
"What I say, goes" might be the proper intention, I was being a little facetious in my initial translation but I decided against it.
I personally would have liked to see a little more green in the broader German ambitions, and more push back against the Agri lobby.
In terms of the war the self imposed constraints keep puzzling me and frustrating others. I just hope that Europe will now get serious on a European defense sector that is able to be self sufficient and can sufficiently standardize stuff across the various armies. In the mean time, Germany ordering another 100 Taurus from the manufacturer and sending Ukraine 2 batches of 50 would be helpful. No individual weapon is a game changer, but taking out that stupid bridge will be one.
If Kyiv can hold out through the next winter—a big if—there are trends that run in its favor.
The article suggests that if Ukraine can withstand the conflict until 2024 and receive continued U.S. support, its chances of victory may increase. The U.S. and European defense industries are stepping up production, and European support for Ukraine remains strong. Russia's sustained war effort faces challenges, including manpower limitations and potential political difficulties for Putin. The article underscores the importance of ongoing assistance for Ukraine amid the dire situation it currently faces.
Author: John R. Deni is a research professor at the U.S. Army War College’s Strategic Studies Institute, a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, and an associate fellow at the NATO Defense College. He’s the author of NATO and Article 5 (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2017). The views expressed are his own.
I do not know how much cross pollination there is between Europe and the Russo-Ukranian war communities. But this youtuber has a background in defense economics and has in-depth analysis of a wide range of subjects in the field. This week an update and analysis of the long war is posted and I thought some people that would normally not see this would enjoy these insights.
cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/11733521
> It's long been understood that the war in Ukraine will likely be a long and hard one, determined as much by production, supply, economics and political will as well as the skill and sacrifice of those fighting it. > > But despite that realisation, the transition of the war into its third year of full-scale fighting still represents a bitter milestone, and while the front has seen some movements recently and the year is likely to see a number of offensive actions - at a strategic level, the lines are moving at a glacial pace, and often only when the supply situation allows. > > By popular vote - today we're going to look at where the war in Ukraine stands in 2024. We'll explore ammunition production and supply, the economic health of the countries involved, some of the trends in terms of the way the fighting is evolving and put together what predictions we can for the coming months. > > Patreon: /perunau
It's long been understood that the war in Ukraine will likely be a long and hard one, determined as much by production, supply, economics and political will as well as the skill and sacrifice of those fighting it.
But despite that realisation, the transition of the war into its third year of full-scale fighting still represents a bitter milestone, and while the front has seen some movements recently and the year is likely to see a number of offensive actions - at a strategic level, the lines are moving at a glacial pace, and often only when the supply situation allows.
By popular vote - today we're going to look at where the war in Ukraine stands in 2024. We'll explore ammunition production and supply, the economic health of the countries involved, some of the trends in terms of the way the fighting is evolving and put together what predictions we can for the coming months.
Patreon: /perunau
My german writing is not very good so I won't butcher your language.
I considered translating the title to "I'm the chancellor, I tell it like it is".
I consider it a shame that Olaf refuses to release the bulls from their stable. I sort of understand his reluctance, but then I do not.
- Usage on Russia proper. So far Ukranians have kept their word on usage of NATO weapons against Russia proper. Future compliance is assured with future aid.
- Deployment of German soldiers. You either train Ukranians to do it (it's not rocket science, LOL) or you have your soldiers do it remote. And if you really have to have people in country, ill bet dollars to donuts if you ask for volunteers, some techs familiar with Taurus will step up.
I thought the leaked audio was hilarious, Soldiers discussing what soldiers are paid to discuss (options, requirements, risks). The leak itself is either monumentally stupid, or intentional. Im still hoping on the latter, but definately not discounting the former.
cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/11732350
> Italy plans to withdraw its air defense system, SAMP/T Mamba, from Slovakia, replacing the American Patriot air defense system. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico received a message from the Italian government about the withdrawal, citing the need to deploy it elsewhere. > > Fico raised concerns about protecting nuclear power plants and other strategic targets in Slovakia. Previously, Slovakia provided military assistance to Ukraine, including a Russian S-300 missile defense system and temporary deployment of US Patriots. > > However, under Fico's new government, Slovakia refused the 14th package of military aid to Ukraine, citing the need to maintain its defense capability. Fico emphasized not obstructing private defense companies' exports and affirmed military-technical cooperation with Ukraine during a meeting with Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal.
So they oppose aid to Ukraine because they need to protect themselves, and then are surprised other European countries allow them to handle their own defense.
Italy plans to withdraw its air defense system, SAMP/T Mamba, from Slovakia, replacing the American Patriot air defense system. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico received a message from the Italian government about the withdrawal, citing the need to deploy it elsewhere.
Fico raised concerns about protecting nuclear power plants and other strategic targets in Slovakia. Previously, Slovakia provided military assistance to Ukraine, including a Russian S-300 missile defense system and temporary deployment of US Patriots.
However, under Fico's new government, Slovakia refused the 14th package of military aid to Ukraine, citing the need to maintain its defense capability. Fico emphasized not obstructing private defense companies' exports and affirmed military-technical cooperation with Ukraine during a meeting with Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal.
Attached: 1 image The GUR confirms that a railroad bridge over the Chapayevka River in the Samara region of Russia has been blown up. Due to damage to the tracks, trains cannot use it anymore.
The GUR confirms that a railroad bridge over the Chapayevka River in the Samara region of Russia has been blown up. Due to damage to the tracks, trains cannot use it anymore.
More pictures, although you have to go to twitter :( raging545
As war between Russia and Ukraine rages on, so do the efforts of nonprofit group One Child Inc.
Die Absage des Kanzlers an eine Lieferung von Taurus-Raketen in die Ukraine hat in seiner Ampel-Koalition viele nicht überzeugt. Jetzt stuft Scholz sein Nein quasi zu einem Kanzler-Machtwort hoch.
cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/11731873
> > Please use your browsers built in function to translate and read the full article in english: > > Olaf Scholz, the German Chancellor, is facing a significant challenge surrounding the Taurus missile, a 5-meter-long, 1.4-ton precision-guided cruise missile of the Bundeswehr. Initially, it was an internal political dispute within the coalition on whether to deliver the missiles to Ukraine. However, since Scholz broke his silence on Taurus last week, the issue has gained international attention, with accusations of indiscretion and a leaked conversation among Bundeswehr officers adding to the complexity. > > In a conversation initiated by Luftwaffeninspekteur Ingo Gerhartz, details about Taurus were disclosed, including the potential quantity of missiles for delivery and their estimated cost. The situation has raised concerns about Germany's security, as the leaked information could pose risks given the country's vulnerability to Russian intelligence. Additionally, the controversy has strained relations with allies, particularly the UK, following Scholz's public explanation for rejecting Taurus delivery to Ukraine and allegations of Germany's inability to handle target guidance independently. > > The British government denied Scholz's claims, but the leaked conversation indicated the UK's involvement in supporting Ukraine with missile guidance. The situation has heightened tensions, with some viewing Scholz's statements as an abuse of intelligence information. There are also accusations of the Chancellor providing false information regarding the necessity of German involvement in Taurus deployment. > > Despite these challenges, Scholz and Defense Minister Boris Pistorius are adopting a defensive strategy, urging unity against Russian President Vladimir Putin's alleged eavesdropping. The government characterizes the situation as absurd Russian propaganda. While the opposition may exert pressure, Scholz appears unlikely to reverse his decision on Taurus delivery, fearing it would be seen as a response to the surveillance and potentially escalate the situation. Overall, the delivery of Taurus missiles to Ukraine seems increasingly improbable in the aftermath of recent events, aligning with Putin's interests.
Die Absage des Kanzlers an eine Lieferung von Taurus-Raketen in die Ukraine hat in seiner Ampel-Koalition viele nicht überzeugt. Jetzt stuft Scholz sein Nein quasi zu einem Kanzler-Machtwort hoch.
> Please use your browsers built in function to translate and read the full article in english:
Olaf Scholz, the German Chancellor, is facing a significant challenge surrounding the Taurus missile, a 5-meter-long, 1.4-ton precision-guided cruise missile of the Bundeswehr. Initially, it was an internal political dispute within the coalition on whether to deliver the missiles to Ukraine. However, since Scholz broke his silence on Taurus last week, the issue has gained international attention, with accusations of indiscretion and a leaked conversation among Bundeswehr officers adding to the complexity.
In a conversation initiated by Luftwaffeninspekteur Ingo Gerhartz, details about Taurus were disclosed, including the potential quantity of missiles for delivery and their estimated cost. The situation has raised concerns about Germany's security, as the leaked information could pose risks given the country's vulnerability to Russian intelligence. Additionally, the controversy has strained relations with allies, particularly the UK, following Scholz's public explanation for rejecting Taurus delivery to Ukraine and allegations of Germany's inability to handle target guidance independently.
The British government denied Scholz's claims, but the leaked conversation indicated the UK's involvement in supporting Ukraine with missile guidance. The situation has heightened tensions, with some viewing Scholz's statements as an abuse of intelligence information. There are also accusations of the Chancellor providing false information regarding the necessity of German involvement in Taurus deployment.
Despite these challenges, Scholz and Defense Minister Boris Pistorius are adopting a defensive strategy, urging unity against Russian President Vladimir Putin's alleged eavesdropping. The government characterizes the situation as absurd Russian propaganda. While the opposition may exert pressure, Scholz appears unlikely to reverse his decision on Taurus delivery, fearing it would be seen as a response to the surveillance and potentially escalate the situation. Overall, the delivery of Taurus missiles to Ukraine seems increasingly improbable in the aftermath of recent events, aligning with Putin's interests.
Indications are that Russia can’t keep waging war like this for more than another year. Ukraine just needs to hold out until then. And it can, with U.S. help.
The article discusses parallels between historical America First isolationists' stance during World War II and contemporary America Firsters' views on Ukraine.
It highlights the skepticism among some politicians, like Sen. Tuberville and Donald Trump, regarding Ukraine's chances of success against Russia.
The author argues that such isolationist attitudes play into Putin's hands by conveying a sense of inevitable triumph for Russia. Despite initial doubts, Ukraine has shown resilience and strength, with increased nationalism and popular support.
The article emphasizes the importance of continued U.S. aid to Ukraine for its survival against Russia's ongoing aggression and the potential consequences if aid is cut off.
It also provides insights into the military dynamics, economic challenges for Russia, and the critical role of U.S. aid in determining Ukraine's fate.
A lot of the more modern NVR systems can be accessed from the internet. So you can use these.
Synology has security station on their NAS systems (although there is some licensing nowadays depending on model and number of cameras.
Ubiquity also offers local storage for their system, that also offers a bellcam (like ring) and different in and outdoor camera models.
Good luck!
Purchase Power Parity only works domestically. Once you venture out in the world, things cost what they cost, no matter how little your populace makes.
A reasonable response with worries we also share. Thanks for that.
I'm from Europe and don't understand why this should not just be resolved with taxes on the companies.
The record profits of the companies are in my vision because the company does not have to do anything for the healthcare and pensions. So if the company does not have to care for it, but society requires it, this is where the government needs to act. Tax the companies and arrange healthcare and retirement stipends. This solves one issue by solving the other, allowing the company to keep doing what it's doing without having to think about healthcare.. that has been resolved.
Individuals then have retirement benefits and can use private retirement insurance to supplement this.
Sure, but with this change it's becoming harder to see the advantage of VMware over hyperV with full lintegration to azure, and azure stack edge. A single interface to manage cloud and on prem that includes monitoring etc.
Sunk cost or not, with this change the companies need to move anyway so the immediate question is why not all the way? but I might be wrong.
Defense industry will make this happen if it's viable. War industry drives much of this. So we will see
A few hundred losing their jobs is kinda misrepresenting the situation isn't it. If you keep seeing each company by itself in terms of firings but then group the market as a whole in terms of people with money in the market.
It's either a few thousand with money in the company vs the people fired from that company... Or the market vs all people fired in the market during these waves.
Plus.. when you are one of the fired people the impact can be deeply impactful, in the US even as far as having no health insurance. While less profit does not have such an impact.
Microsoft hyperV and azure will keep munching on their business.
Unity is firing people as a result of a failed monetization attempt by the chief executive. I would argue the employees should have a case against the company and the chief executive. As this was so poorly implemented, fault could be argued.
Troops told The New York Times that Russia's exploding drones were forcing Ukrainian soldiers to move on foot and abandon vehicles.
Unfortunately, the Russians out manufacture Ukraine with these drones.
Especially not now. With the Gaza war, The Houthi's attacking shipping and US congress beholden to MAGA loons, his chances are looking up. Befriending Iran was an excellent choice, they had some cards up their sleeve to destabilize the middle east that could be played now. I wonder how long it will be before we see an Iranian nuclear test.
I have had all of them lugged against me in conversations, is there any source for the image, and more importantly sources that refute the nonsense claims?
Ignore the fact that it's coming from Breitbart..
No, I don't think I will. I don't want to give them clicks.
That was the risk of remaining on the platform the moment musk took over. And if not then, when he started stripping it down and making it less reliable. And if not then, maybe when he started pursuing shadow banning again.
No government or news business has any business anymore being on Twitter. They should use the fedpub protocol and push out their messages there.
This will allow their readers/citizens to use a broad scala of apps to read them, allows more 3rd party apps to integrate them.
Governments and newspapers must hold the reigns over their own infra or risk this happening.
Haha.. that's an excellent point. Little Britain was ahead of its time.
The war in Israel and Gaza has diverted media attention away from Ukraine, and it could end up diverting resources for war fighting too. But these two wars are very different, and for the West a lot more is at stake in Ukraine.
Timestamps in the description.
American deigned ‘DroneHunter’ UAV uses AI flight control and targeting systems to patrol protected airspace, detect, target and neutralize hostile drones.
https://fortemtech.com/products/dronehunter-f700/
Two hundred Leopard 1A5s is a lot of Leopard 1A5s. But even they will disappear quickly if the Ukrainians don’t deploy them the right way.
In the past nine months, a German-Danish-Dutch consortium, along with individual contributions from Denmark and Germany, has pledged and added 95 Leopard 1A5 tanks to Ukraine's military aid, with the most recent commitment including an extra 25 tanks.
Ukraine is now set to receive a total of 195 Leopard 1A5s, becoming its most numerous Western-style tanks. Despite the Leopard 1A5's advantages in accuracy, range, and speed, its thin armor poses a challenge, requiring strategic deployment to mitigate vulnerabilities and leverage its shooting capabilities effectively.
Ukraine needs to employ proper tactics to make the most of these tanks, particularly in the absence of additional Leopard 2s and potential challenges in receiving more military aid from NATO allies.
The Russian Volunteer Corps said it had ambushed a Russian transport in the Bryansk region. It is reported a FSB Lt. Colonel was killed during this ambush.
Today, there are a lot of positive updates from the Tokmak direction.
- The headquarters of Russia's Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol has been destroyed by Ukraine through the use of Western donated cruise missiles.
- The United States is heading for another government shutdown.
- Russia is struggling across their front lines and Russian morale reaches new lows.
- Ukraine has launched one of its biggest attacks of the Ukraine/Russia war on Crimea today. Ukraine has successfully destroyed the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol using western provided Storm Shadow/Scalp EG missiles.
- We are also learning that the commander of the Black Sea Fleet may have been killed during the attack, but we await confirmation.
- While the attack was occurring in Sevastopol, Ukraine also carried out strikes on many other targets and launched an unprecedented cyber attack on Russian systems.
