This still ignores that if it's a social construct for one group, it's a social construct for all groups. You can't simultaneously use it as reason to excuse certain groups (based on race ironically enough) accountability, while absolving others of any responsibility. Either race matters or it doesn't, pick ONE. If it doesn't matter than STFU about "white males" all the time. People, you included seem to think just saying "social construct" is an automatic win the argument card without ever realizing it's full implications. All your comment sounds like is a justification for your racism.
That's funny, because it pretty exclusively mentions race. ...and then is incredibly racist towards that particular race........and is coming from the crowd that usually screams about race being a "social construct"
If it walks like a duck......
Lemmy is no different than reddit when it comes to mods abusing their power. People here think they're all different and better than, but that's just because they haven't had an independent thought and non-conforming to Lemmy opinion so they don't have to deal with it.
Remember: race is a social construct ......until you can use it to criticize white people, then those people are white and bad and it's objective reality, there's no "social construct" anymore.
How do you people not hear yourselves?
This is the kind of shit that makes people (correctly) say "both sides". Both sides are racist, both sides think their racism is justified, both sides completely overlook their own hypocrisy on the issue. The only change is which race they start the discussion with.
This is very cherry-picked issues they've included here though. Yes, of course no one with a brain is thinking of these issues specifically when they say that. Both sides are bad, both are hypocritical, both break rules and want their rule breaking to be ignored when it's to their advantage. One side is worse, doesn't mean both sides aren't bad.
Misleading title by propaganda pushing "news" sub. It's funny that I can often know before checking whether or not a post is "world news" just by the title
Especially if it's a man being accussed
Fuck Rolling Stone though. I still have no respect for them after the UVA thing. (and to much lesser extent their recent 250 guitarists list) what a joke of a publication.
Literally EVERY TIME it’s mentioned, someone assumes that a thing being a social construct means we should erase it.
That's because that's EXACTLY how you make it sound.
Calling things a social construct is a social construct. Leave LSD to the adults please.
Which is why it's dumb to try to negate a thing like crime by saying it's a social construct. The language we are using to talk about it being a social construct is a social construct. Literally YOU are a social construct, but here you are, worried about "wage theft" which is also a social construct. So do things being a social construct matter or not because if not, lets stop trying to negate anything we don't like by calling it a social construct, and if so lets apply it evenly and take it to it's logical conclusion. I would say "reject modernity, embrace monkee" but rejection, modernity, embracement, and monkee are all social constructs.
Crime is a social construct = wage theft is a social construct, and according to the law of internet arguments something being a social construct means it doesn't matter and/or it's dumb to complain about it, so don't worry, it's all fine.
Lol. I remember when Trump said he was going to ban it and everyone was like nooooo. This is so concerning for free speech. Now that it's not Trump doing it, everyone says: Great, everyone should ban it.
Both sides is legit because Clinton said deplorables and you defended it. Now Trump says vermin and you want it to be a big deal. It is literally the same thing and you don't care when it's your side but want everyone to get worked into a frenzy when it's the other guy.
It literally is both sides in this case though. I mean fuck Trump and he has a long laundry list of other stuff to legitimately complain about him for, but Clinton had the whole "deplorables" thing. You guys were all cool with that and defended her. Now he Trump does basically the same thing and you wanna make it a big deal. Pick a rule and stick to it. Stop changing them depending on how much you like the person breaking them.
I'm sure they do and it's misleading stat. These studies always find a way to get the result they want instead of the one that's honest.
This article and study seems pretty toxic to me. Acting and talking like these human beings are lab rats in order to push an agenda. Seems incredibly sexist in my eyes.
Because liberal concern trolls don't give 2 fucks about being hypocrites. They kept talking about how Trumps wife was a pornstar a couple years ago too, because she's a former model that posed topless once or twice. Meanwhile they idealize and elevate actual pornstars and would scream if anyone insulted based on their profession.