Id just use a random name sheet. Get some fancy names print em out sprinkle in a little setting specific stuff and roll dice for it. 100 names each and a D100 will do the trick, if its not fitting at all, just roll again.

People like you are why anti climate people are on the rise again. Shame on you.

Exactly, thats what im arguing and uncontrolled immigration is a problem for our society, just as the rise in antisemitism or right wing idiology are.

And there is no human right to getting to stay in EU when you traveled through other countries first. Ukraine is a different story. This isn't meant offensive, its just a fact.

The way to strengthen the weakest link is to reduce the number of people destroying it from inside and giving those that work with us the tools to repair it better, so, throw out people that don't belong here due to crimes (actual crimes not a parking ticket or shit like that) or involvement in organizations that are considered problematic. And the way to reduce the number of people of destroying it from the outside is to do better Educational work especially in structural weak regions and settle more people from that weak link there (unless they are at risk for violence, i wouldn't settle gay people in rural Saxony for example...)

Exactly and working against that fear is the important part, throwing out people that are problematic is a good step, you can simultaneously work on better integration, like Germany did with the overhaul of the citizenship program.

Efficient integration also means reducing the number of immigrants in certain areas that have too many, moving them somewhere else is better as they don't have the ability to build subsocieties

And of course its not about the numbers itself, its about the number of immigrants that shouldn't be here due to crimes, there was almost a decade of the issue being effectively ignored and the voters show that, every other day is a headline about a immigrant doing crimes and being known beforehand to the authoritys, its a actual issue, this issue causes xenophobia.

And im not in favor of a "upper limit" or throwing out people that integrate. Its idiotic to do that and doesn't help at all, its even counterproductive.

And of course, fighting the root of the problem would help a lot but its often not possible or too complex, or in some cases counterproductive "look how much money we spend on those [slurs] while people here have it so bad" -right people fishing for voters (efficiently due to our current economic situation)

Doing something against problems without using their rethoric is a good thing and the problems they use for their Antidemocracy propaganda exist and ignoring problems because the extremists talk about them won't help at all.

Man good we throw out the English people.

On the other hand more news like this might get people away from far right.

Oh sorry.

It just gives you the address of the nearest preschool to start over XD

No. Fediverse already has enough redfash trash. We don't need the nazi trash from Threads.

And we don't want Facebook to get shit loads of data, and Threads is too big to federate with smaller servers, its like a DDOS for low traffic servers.

😎

Good, hope he lives up to this.

No its the same as scalping but the original thing is free.

Yeah that as well

Yeah i know this "debate" was just one guy having a stroke and another one having verbal diarrhea... God both of them should be in a retirement home.

Thats kinda interesting... Would have thought he denies climate change straight up.

As said free Cloud, they aren't helping the course at all just farming cloud.

Yes i know and thats why im asking you. Especially because violence didn't work.

The only awnser is maybe.

Don't tell that to me, im doing something about it, i can still say that the destructive "protest" isn't helping at all and that it just doesn't make things better or bring positive attention towards the topic. Its still counterproductive.

And it not being acute means you don't see the building burn, even though we can statistically show that it is, this is basic psychology "we have floods every year" "yeah it was way hotter outside when i was a child" you get it.

You bring no arguments I could ignore. You only make assumptions and claims.

Here are some German (german language) sources supporting my claims you might translate it with a translator.

https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/bsw-wagenknecht-linke-102.html

https://www.n-tv.de/ticker/BSW-zieht-vor-allem-Menschen-an-die-bisher-die-Linke-oder-die-AfD-waehlten-article24990766.html

https://taz.de/Abschneiden-von-BSW-und-Linkspartei/!6015450/

https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/buendnis-sahra-wagenknecht-108.html

https://www.tagesschau.de/wahl/archiv/2024-06-09-EP-DE/umfrage-bsw.shtml

https://www.tagesschau.de/wahl/archiv/2024-06-09-EP-DE/umfrage-werwas.shtml

https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/europawahl-bsw-sahra-wagenknecht-analyse-100.html

https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/europawahl-osten-afd-100.html

BSW is left "conservative", is way stronger in east Germany than west, has ties to Russia (due to Wagenknecht herself)

How do you even come to the conclusion BSW was authoritarian (that describes the use of (or desire to reach) a strong central power the rejection of political plurality) or left wing (which is defined by striving for societal progress and especially equal rights and equal chances for everyone, which BSW denies migrants).

BSW doesn't have a official party program, but from what Wagenknecht herself and most of her followers are standing for, they are for stuff like mass surveillance, chat control... They don't like wrongthink wich might, just might be because Wagenknecht was very involved in the last years of SED, the party that is known for hardcore authoritarian shit. Also who they are funded and allied with speaks volumes, Putin and Xi aren't known to be very libertarian or democratic.

That is something you never brought up before. What point do you think you make with this phenomenon?

As seen in sources for proof of the fact.

I think the east, due to the very short democratic time is tending towards extremism, in general. The east was also more supportive of NSDAP and especially Saxony is extreme. I don't know why its like this, what i day here isn't provable, but based on evidence. Afd is btw the strongest party in all of the east basically.

Where you sit usually concurs with your political positions, but does not define it.

In language it kinda does as the left right thing is essentially based on this.

Why should we, since it's debunked?

Well, firstly i just used it as a example and Secondly, who debunked it? Can you give insight, i think its rather more proven than anything. Both sides tend to authoritarian and antidemocratic views thats the key takeaway, and the further down they go their side, the more similar they become, they do however not reach each other, a horseshoe has a finite end and the sides are still apart, it's explicitly not a circle.

Again something you claimed but never supported with anything.

BSW tries to get closer to AFD, they are anti EU and have ties to Russia and China, they want to end all help for Ukraine, want to leave nato and what not to throw the state Germany under the bus. They are a threat to democracy because they would like to deliver Germany to Russia/China on a silver plate.