Skip Navigation
Nintendo sues streamer for playing pre-release, emulated Switch games
  • Obviously you just mandate your game and console be always online and at that point you may as well just live stream the game to their house, don't need to download if you never actually own it right?? Make them pay per the minute of game time and only unlock the next level after they've played long enough! Hell! Why even sell a game?? Just have people pay you for the right to advertise that they paid for it and charge them a daily subscription to keep the rights! Nobody owns anything but you! Art and entertainment is merely a vessel to siphon money from the masses! Purchase their souls for a hit of dopamine! Rent them their own eyes!

  • Is it just me or is this a terrible idea?
  • Eh, it's also a bit of a teaching opportunity with kids. A decent parent will teach kids which things are okay to hit and which ones aren't, and this is something that can help with that. Someone's probably going to get hit once or twice yeah. But kids also get mad when they can't stick forks in outlets. I don't see this toy being any worse than a sword or gun toy.

  • Lack Of Interest In The PS5 Pro Is Forcing Scalpers To Sell Them For A Loss
  • Not sure if you're being sarcastic but "digital only" means the only way to put games on the device is via digital downloads (aka from the web store downloaded via internet).

    Each company tries this because it effectively eliminates the third party/aftermarket sales and gets them a monopoly on prices. Never have to lower the price on a game to move physical copies of you don't have physical copies to store, so games no matter how old can stay at full price for as long as they like. Don't have to cut your margins by selling at a reduced price to a third party to resell so all the profit comes home.

    I know why companies do it, it makes sense financially. But turns out a lot of people aren't fans of not being allowed to have the option to physically own their own media, even if they don't always do it.

  • What was around or ended more recently than people think?
  • Stuff like this is also why a lot of companies have also moved away from pensions, one it's expensive, two mismanagement, but it turns out that offering to pay someone for free until the end of their life doesn't make shareholders happy, so fuck the employees right?

  • What was around or ended more recently than people think?
  • Weren't they superceded by LCDs not LEDs? The whole big thing with Nixies was that you could display digits but if one filament burned out (which it relatively quickly did) the whole bulb was bad and even then you had to pump power into them and use these complicated plugs.

    Enter LCDs, they take ages to burn in, you can run them off a coin battery for literal years, and they're a dozen times cheaper to make.

  • I’m Absolutely Sure America Is About to Get Exactly What It Wants
  • Honestly yeah. My hopes are at this point our electoral process does exactly what it just did. It's clear a lot of people went out and voted for him. Not a small group but a ton. And my resignment has just been "Okay, this is what you asked for, buckle up".

    It's gonna suck ass and I really hope they don't start some bullshit that makes them squeak out of the mess they're about to step in. (They'll definitely try to) But let's give the American people exactly what they asked for and just try to stop the house from catching on fire while they realize what a bad idea it was.

  • 'Put that everywhere': Steve Bannon admits 'Project 2025 is the agenda' after Trump wins
  • Additional edit: idfk man. Scream it from the rooftops if you want to. Clearly something needs to be done about this shit, but I can tell straight off from this article that it's just a tee-up for them to go "look how dramatic the snowflakes are" or whatever bullshit they're spewing this week. Fuck these guys, and all the bullshit they want to pull, but playing into their hand like that is hard to avoid.

  • 'Put that everywhere': Steve Bannon admits 'Project 2025 is the agenda' after Trump wins
  • Pretty sure they're joking. Not sure how much, but that seems to be the tone they're giving. "Oh yeah let's do the thing they said we would haha". It's not very funny but it's like someone getting a gun and saying "Time to shoot up a school hurr hurr"

    Not that that makes it any better, but still. Something important to keep in mind, you go blasting this around with "look he said it!" And they're just going to laugh at you for believing getting upset.

    Edit: I'm not saying that this is okay at all but the guy in the article definitely has the tone of "oh yeah let's tell them we are gonna start up the murder machine out front" I understand that there are a lot of people that do stick to this rhetoric. But I pretty much guarantee that in the context of this article it's bait to get people to go "he said he's gonna start up his murder machine!" And then they'll go on some rant about liberals or whatever else.

    The guy is still probably an absolute shithole but you need to be able to recognize when they are setting people up for a punchline that furthers their agenda.

    It's just like the church guys who stand outside with the old "god hates (slur)" signs. They believe it, but fighting them or screaming about it just pushes their agenda. Condemn them, call them out, but hysteria just gives them ammunition.

  • Drop your most "wtf that's not how the world works" from movies/tv shows.
  • Actually yeah now that you mention it, it does sound like something out of a renaissance festival where they're setting up a scheduled show lol.

    "Dirty Dave I'm calling you out! You and I are going to have a duel to the death! At 12:00 in the town square! Right in front of the Hootenanny Stage! Be there to see who is the winner! Tips welcome!"

  • Drop your most "wtf that's not how the world works" from movies/tv shows.
  • I'll just add to this, 9mm, or any handgun really, is still very loud. The reason it doesn't seem as loud is because when most people are shooting there are two main things happening.

    1. They're behind the barrel, normally this doesn't matter much, but the sound is at least a little directional, so being in front of it is going to make it much louder.
    2. Most people aren't shooting it in their house, they're at a gun range. The space in front of you at the range allows for the sound to travel and the pressure to spread through the room, slightly reducing the impact of the sound. Shoot one in a tiny room and it's going to be much worse for you.

    Again it's still really loud, but the context of where the sound is being made does make a difference. Obviously larger rounds will be louder, but that doesn't mean rounds like 9mm are safe for your ears at all.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AB
    abigscaryhobo @lemmy.world
    Posts 0
    Comments 112