I have repeated this argument elsewhere but I can say it again. When you are running a mainstream instance, you should be obliged to uphold every dissenting voices. Otherwise you will end up effectively censoring free speech. Your argument is extremely narrow minded
Triggered by advocacy for free speech? I have seen lots of braindead clowns like you
Censoring for differences in political opinion is an obvious violation of freedom of speech. If you don't like them, censor them for yourself. Why are you advocating what others should or shouldn't hear?
That's what I thought. Being a man is overall harder
It's funny that the bigoted ideology that architectured 9/11, Islam, is very well alive and kicking
While the ideology of slave ownership is dead or dying. Call it Christianity or white supremacy
In other words, Islam is the greater danger
I agree with that. I'm not some lunatic tranny. Just saying that namecalling black people, trans people and other minorities, just gives them more fake heed to ban you. If you stay respectful while criticizing them you would earn more support imo
Although making fun of them is important, it should not be your mainstream image. That's the problem with the non-left in America. As a non-western person, the left seems much more accepting than the right, even though they are clearly on the wrong