auraithx @ auraithx @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

0

Comments

100

Joined

3 wk. ago

You didn't make a point you asked me a question. The list I've given shows who'se recieved the most from Israeli interests. Whether or not they're actually from Israel is irrelevant.

I imagine there was a rehearsal and if he deviated from that they would’ve just muted him. I’m no tv producer but iirc they also have a few seconds delay of wiggle room. Don’t imagine they want another Janet Jackson.

And that, is irrelevant. If you have a better point make it im not gonna make your arguments for you.

;/

Algorithms themselves are fine. It’s wikipedia. I’d actually use it if it brought me to interesting pages based on a recommender algorithm.

I mean, you brought it up.

Completely left on the authoritarian scale and the social one. Economic axis isn’t about morality but mine is also the best there. (Neo proudhonian / mutualist via non violent agorist counter economic revolution)

Fuck the dems. If there’s one thing we can agree on they shouldn’t get back in.

I am a pragmatist. And the best option at the time was not letting that lunatic anywhere near power. Unless you’re an accelerationist but that ain’t the argument most are making.

It’s impossible to know the impact it had on people on sitting it out. Probably they just stole it anyway but still. Hate to see leftists enabling the fascists.

lmao did it take you a full day to come up with that cope. The list is Iraeli interests, your point is irrelevant.

Just like MAGA on Palestine, the tankies will deny it the whole time.

I'm not punching left I'm punching up at the authoritarians. There's no-one left of me.

By “demonstrably true” I mean the things we said would happen (West Bank sold off to Adelson, genocide would ramp up across the board, annexation of all palestianian areas) are now coming to fruition.

No, it's not how a platform should be run and I will continue pushing for better solutions and then using them.

The design is inherently limiting and stupid. You will just end up in the exact same situation as Reddit where a large percent of the discussion can be blocked at the will of some moron.

Seems it's already fallen to me. I don't see much short of a revolution reversing it and the libs certainly aren't going to do that. AuthLeft are tiny and as far gone as MAGA on certain topics. LibRight are on AuthRight's side. And there's like 10 LibLefts.

I am an anarchist and have only voted once for secession. I would've voted against Trump if I were American. What is your point though?

Then why did Adelson pay trump 150m? Why did the tactics in the west bank ramp up only after the election? You think Kamala was going to carve up and auction off the gaza strip?

Neolibs and Fascists can both be bad but there is a difference. Again, nuance.

A is their second favourite after O, IIRC.

Yep my mum is AB+ and she is the magnet if I'm not on holiday with them :)

I'm so delicious I manage to protect the full villa.

My claims weren't based on numbers but policy changes. The numbers will reflect them with time. Just getting started.

Of course she would support Israel too. The argument is that Trump would be worse, which is now demonstrably true.

It matters because unless you see through the propaganda pushed by zionists/russia/whoever else wants the west to fall - you will side with them again.

How is that ironic? You are failing to grasp the nuance in difference between Kamala and Trump.

Do you have some inherent deficiency that makes it impossible to see nuance? In another world you'd be MAGA.

No, not business as usual, as I explained.

Here is Chomsky explaining why yes, that is the more logical choice

https://chomsky.info/an-eight-point-brief-for-lev-lesser-evil-voting/

I had some nitwit self-described Chomsky-anarchist the other day who sounded a lot like you, went real quite after I shared that.

As a leftist, I'm hoping the never-kamala types can rejoin the rest of the leftists in opposing outright fascism, thanks.