He who truly knows, knows that he knows not
Or
The more you know, the more you realize you don't know.
But also, understanding that about yourself doesn't take more knowledge or intelligence than you currently have. As another user (darkdarkhouse)^ posted, you can understand how the brain works and still not have all the knowledge in the world (hard drive with a map/directory of the hard drive on it).
Change the combination on my luggage!
If you really wanted to have a good time, you could screen-shot everything as is and make that the desktop, then put all the real shortcuts into a folder on the desktop anywhere and watch the fun ensue
Eta: for extra entertainment, don't forget to hide the Taskbar
Imperial, obviously: F(reedom)T(ons) and fractions thereof. 1FT is the amount of data that it takes to store the entire King James edition of the New Testament and the Bill of Rights as a PDF.
The kom.bu.cha! mush.room! peo.ple! sit.ting a.round all day!
Perhaps that anyone of any religion is not also atheist.
Anyone in any theology believes in only their deity, but doesn't believe in the hundreds of other recorded, historical deities.
Even the theists are atheists.
"Now, sir. We're looking at now, now. What's happening now is happening... now."
"What happened to then?"
"We missed it."
"When?!"
"Just now."
"When will then... be now?"
"Soon."
All good friend... it's too easy to get caught up in the emotions of charged politics
If I had to guess, I'd say that they were talking about how it's barely affordable just to live in some places (wage slaves), and moving yourself and your family to an entire other state takes substantial time and money. Not to mention the emotional difficulty of leaving everyone and everything you know.
The same argument was made about recently freed slaves who had nowhere to go afterward, and how they should just move if they don't like the continuing slavery-like treatment where they lived.
It does seem very cold and privileged from that perspective to tell someone to just up and leave, but this specific comparison seems unnecessarily impassioned
I don't think it's fair to say 40% of Americans.
He only had ~74M votes in the last election, and he still lost. That equates generously to around 1/4 of all Americans (329M), back then. If the support numbers haven't shifted, that's still significantly under 25% of Americans that are too stupid to be left alone with a box of crayons.
You obviously don't understand just how important that guy is
Hey guys, let's give the man some credit. He's the one we have to thank (blame?) for creating the internet... which, as i have since come to understand, is akin to a series of very long and narrow tubes
No i... ain't no crook and I ain't no vandal just pouring one out from a can of Campbell's™