Le conseil constitutionnel a depuis longtemps tranché la question et consacré ce droit.

L'article de la déclaration de 1789 est assez clair et c'est bien la priorité privée toute entière qui est un droit "inviolable et sacré". De fait l'expropriation est par exemple strictement encadrée par cette même déclaration et uniquement possible avec une "juste indemnisation", ce qui montre bien que ce droit n'est pas uniquement opposable à la noblesse ou je ne sais qui.

Le gros de ces 3 millions se trouve dans la diagonale du vide. Tous les parisiens en manque d'espace ont pas forcément envie de déménager dans la campagne creusoise.

I think so, but with ads just like the free tier of Spotify.

And then YouTube Premium is just not a good deal in my eyes, £12.99 a month is an awful lot to pay just to not see Ads.

I think this includes YouTube music (at least in my market it does) which makes it fairly good value for money if you already subscribe to a music streaming app.

No only all the extensions.

I have played every iteration since the first came out and the VI has been the most disappointing so far. IV or V with their extensions are better.

But worse for those looking for a rental.

Rent control is a bandaid on a real problem that makes things worse long term. What California needs is build more, which means end the NIMBY and unfreeze property taxes so those seating on underutilized land are forced to develop it or sell.

In the 1950s anything made over $400,000 was taxed 90%

Not capital gains.

Given the millions of people whose retirement fund is invested in the stock market, yes it will.

Ashktually half people below the median.

Same here. I love Nolan's movies and while Interstellar was well made, the whole nonsensical plot killed it for me.

The set-point theory is junk science propagated by the HAES movement. Human bodies can't escape the laws of physics, if you eat less energy than you expand you'll lose weight unless your body somehow evolved the ability for photosynthesis or nuclear power.

It's the F14. Its wings fucking move to change the shape of the aircraft!

Doesn't change anything to Oxfam doing cherry picking.

Those two months do skew the numbers. Why do you think they specifically picked March and not January as anybody else would?

You can defend your opinions without having to manipulate the numbers.

Get off your soap box, I just pointed out that Oxfam numbers are manipulated.

Ah the yearly Oxfam cherry picked data. For this one, they say "since 2020" but really this is "since Mars 2020 when the stock market was crashing and hitting incredible lows", which helps inflate their click-baity figures.

He was always like this and has been distributing public money left and right. France's public spending and taxation as a share of GDP are at all time highs.

It's just the French left thinks everybody to their right is a spawn of Reagan and Thatcher.

Time is running out on the climate, how many decades can we wait for the "perfect" solution to show up when we have a good enough one right now they can help?