Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CE
Posts
0
Comments
1,371
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I can believe there's no neat little notepad with a bunch of names on it, but there's definitely a shit load of evidence incriminating a bunch of powerful people, given what we already know.

  • Dems should pull from the same playbook the Republicans pulled from when they voted to repeal Obamacare like 30 times while Obama was still in office. Make the Republicans keep voting to protect pedos, and then when they're out of the majority make Trump use his veto to protect pedos.

  • I'm no expert, but I would think that altering evidence is a huge risk.

    • If you want the changes done by experts, so they're harder to identify, you have to let the experts in on what you're doing. That means more potential leakers.
    • If you make any changes that contradict the physical evidence, you've outed yourself.
    • The changes you make can be credibly contradicted by people who have seen the unedited versions.
    • You might have to change a lot of stuff, especially if your boy was very close to the sex trafficker in question.

    If you get caught, you've just made the problem 100x worse, as a lot of people are just going to assume your guilt as soon as they hear you've tampered with the evidence.