That's how replies are made from mastodon afaik.
It all comes down to:
But the largest hurdle to making plant-based proteins a more viable alternative for everyone is the U.S. government’s deep investment in the status quo. Washington spends up to $38 billion subsidizing the meat and dairy industries each year, a move that keeps prices artificially low.
I wonder how they will pin this on democrats.
I'm getting full speed (currently 290mbps on verizon 5g).
Thanks for the reminder to switch to merlin firmware.
The suit was filed by PleasrDAO, a digital art collective that purchased the album from Shkreli in 2021 after Shkreli was ordered to fork it over to cover a $7.4 million forfeiture tied to his 2017 fraud conviction. (Shkreli purchased the album for $2 million; PleasrDAO paid double that.) According to the lawsuit, Shkreli violated the terms of both the original purchase agreement and the forfeiture order by allegedly making and retaining a digital copy of the album, playing it during his live streams, and sending it to others.
I mean that I'm quite sure but don't feel like citing it, myself.
You may be even safer with a lighter helmet. I use a full face moto-cross helmet for a similar activity.
Allegedly a heavier helmet meant for higher speeds may cause injuries that could be avoided. It's obviously still way better than no helmet but potentially not optimal. I'm not an expert but it's something I came across in my own research.
Helmet gang unite!
First line of the article reads:
When he reserved the truck he had a house, but when he got the truck he had an apartment
Why can't we blame Microsoft?
Thanks for the rec. That whole shop looks amazing.
I looked into this a while ago. It seems the best you can do is to try to look the most "average". All attempts to obfuscate details other than "average" make you stand out even worse.
To be fair this article is about Tucker's media company denying that they have anything to do with this and all that's been "produced" so far are Russian dubs of old episodes.
It will not shock me if it's true but so far there is no evidence.
You might want to make up definitions for genocide but in 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Victims are targeted because of their real or perceived membership of a group, not randomly.
Yea what are even the implications of being individually "sanctioned"? They can't travel to Canada now??
Whatever keeps you in that echo chamber of flawed logic and selective comprehension!
It's been explained over and over. They will hear out of context snippets stitched together out of chronological order.
How do you not get this?
It's been explained over and over. Nobody will listen to 5 hours of recorded tapes. They will hear out of context snippets stitched together out of chronological order.
How do you not get this?
If we don't care what republicans think then why do we care about meeting their demands to release the tape?
If elections are won and lost on dem turnout then why give republicans the opportunity to create misleading sound clips? Do you think more dems are likely to listen to the entire tape or just a few moments stitched together played on the radio?