delmain @ delmain @beehaw.org

Posts

0

Comments

57

Joined

2 yr. ago

Or an exploit is found that can turn it on.

"We need to obfuscate all our actual goals to benefit ourselves, so let's keep kicking a tiny minority."

If you mean like, self-driving then I don't know. Subaru has lane-assist and adaptive cruise control that uses only cameras though. They use two cameras for binocular vision though so it might not fall for this, I don't know. Would be a good test.

As a YTM hater, here are my reasons:

1. They closed down Google Play Music, which was an objectively better service, and didn't have feature parity in YTM when they did so. They had promised it, so regardless of arguments towards what it might have now or what features might not be needed because XYZ reasons, they promised that all the features from GPM would be in YTM before GPM was sunset and that was simply not true.
2. Maybe this has changed, but at launch, I couldn't "Like" a song to influence my generated playlists without it "Liking" the video on main youtube, which influences my video recommendations. I don't want YouTube serving me exclusively music videos because it sees my YTM Likes and vice versa.

If you played right at release, there was a bug that was causing that.

I explicitly remember it being a big annoyance of mine in my first playthrough, but it's fixed now.

do you have the links to those actual tweets? I'd love to read what was posted, but these screenshots are too small.

A billionaire's kid ruined a perfectly functional company/division due to being a poor judge of character and overly greedy?

Here's my surprised face: -_-

DA2 had it IIRC but Inquisition didn't, and it looks like it's not in Veilguard because overview makes it look more like modern FF games which definitely don't have anything like that.

So glad that the court system is working efficiently. This happened in 2020 and we're only just now going to trial for it in 2024.

Yeah, I'm not completely getting this. The article reads as if the study was done just to waste time and really they wanted to propose their "if rideshare is done sustainably" suggestions.

I live in a place where a car is basically required for normal life. As such, my experience with ride-share services is exclusively when I'm traveling and thus don't know the area super well. Ride-share rides "replace" a transit ride, yes, but in that it's theoretically possible to have taken a different option, but does that mean that the public transit option is good or reasonable at that time or place?

Like, if my party and I have been out drinking for a while and are leaving, could we theoretically walk to a nearby subway station and figure out a couple of changes and get back home? Probably. Is it a lot easier to go "Hey Lyft/Uber please pick us up and drive us home while I wobble drunkenly in the back seat"? Yes. Does this count as a "replaced" ride? If ride-share didn't exist, I would have had to take the public transit option (which is assuming that normal taxi's didn't also exist). If I knew I wouldn't be able to ride-share home though, is there a serious chance that I would have just not done what I wanted and instead done something else while staying sober so that I could public transit home? Yes, definitely.

Ride-share to me just opens a new list of possibilities. If I know I'm relying on ride-share and I'm not worried about the cost, the list of things I can do goes up. It gives me more options for my evening. Are we saying here that that's a problem and that people should feel limited to what they can access via public transit? I mean, fair argument but I don't agree with it.

I didn't say they were interesting, we didn't get nearly enough interaction from them to know, but there was unarguably much more depth to them than "agent 123" in most shooters

I have a very simple reason for hating Concord and being slightly happy that it failed: They bait-and-switched the hell out of all of us with that reveal video.

You can't build up an interesting world filled with characters like that and then give us a PvP-only hero shooter. Who do you think you are, old Blizzard?

I agree that your setup would be perfect, but the reality of the situation is that it depends on the engine and how much time the programmers/artists/whatever have.

Like if the engine doesn't support dynamically resizing equipment, then you have to make every single piece of equipment over again for every body shape. That is a potentially massive amount of work, even if there is tooling that will automate most of it and only require retouching. There's only so much time in the day, and every hour that people are working on this is an hour that they aren't working on building more levels or adding more systems, etc.

Is it better to have "Body Shape A/B" or "Male Body / Female Body"? Because those are the options that are the same amount of work.

It would be better to have a ton of body options. It would be even better to have sliders and have everything adjust itself to fit whatever shape you make. But both of those options take time to work on, and time is money.

I don't think it's fair to call (for a specific choice) BG3's developers lazy because they only have 2 (or 4 for some races) body sizes. They are just optimizing their time investment.

I don't know if that's true. Like if Apple had to fully replace every single iPhone that had any sort of issue, that I don't know that AppleCare would be a product that they could actually offer, at least a reasonable price. And I know that a significant number of people use apple specifically because they know that they can pay more once and then just go to an Apple store to get literally anything fixed.

If Apple is prohibited from having any tools to fix their own devices (in the world where they just choose to have them non-repairable), then could they actually maintain their business while having to throw away devices constantly?

I was absolutely heartbroken when I found out that Ron Wasserman doesn't know how to play guitar at all and that this entire song was made on a keyboard

There's... no details at all other than "it's happening"?

Why even announce this with no details, Knowing it's gonna piss people off? What were sag-aftra and Replica hoping for here?

Again, I don't necessarily think that he wasn't overly involved in pursuing this direction, but unless it's proven in court, no one can sue him for losing their job over it.

I'm pretty sure that you generally can't do that, in the US at least.

A C-level officer is required generally to act in the best interest of the company, but as long as the genuinely think that what they were doing was an attempt to improve the company in some way, you'd be hard-pressed to ever prove that they weren't acting in the best interest. You'd have to find physical proof that they were intentionally sabotaging the company, and (probably) no one who is smart enough to become a CEO is going to do that.

We've had one, yes, but what about second reboot?

Mine by far is July 7, 2021 when the Bolts won the Stanley Cup at home versus the Canadiens. They had won the previous year, but it was in the social distanced "bubble" finals in 2020, so this one actually had people at it, and they won.

I had painted my beard blue for the entire finals. The big fan group I'm with had been marching through the city down to the game every game night for a few weeks, and then to win it all... Just so so good.

https://imgur.com/qyW6URW