ell1e @ ell1e @leminal.space

I code and do art things, see https://cloudy.horse64.org/ and https://codeb

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

30

Joined

2 wk. ago

This is definitely going to be copy&pasted as a foundation in many EU states. Therefore, that it requires Android and iOS at all, let alone Google Play, is a fundamental error. Some people avoid smartphones for good reasons, yet still access parts of the internet that may apparently soon be gatekept by this new age verification mechanism.

The main problem isn't the Google Play integration, but that this requires an Android or iOS device at all. This should be based on something like flutter or electron, and be easily portable with an agnostic build script for e.g. Linux, UBports, postmarketOS, and so on, as well. If only for the reason that most Android and iOS devices will effectively become unpatchable after the mandatory 5-ish years run out, while a standardized UEFI desktop platform will not. There are so many reasons not to have a "standard" smartphone nowadays.

And if you accept terms of use: https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-app-android-wallet-ui/issues/15

Apparently they want everybody to get some sort of "EU wallet", that is, some digital signed identity which sounds super dystopian. But that's just what I read. It sounds like a complete disaster.

I feel like a productive way to address this would be to make a child mode mandatory for all operating systems, as some EU countries already did, and then to give parents a better incentive to actually enable it. For example, all end-user devices could be pressured into prominently showing an option to enable it when first booted up (without forcing your hand either way) so that it's hard to miss. There are so many other ways to improve this situation.

I didn't find the exact same article, but this one makes pretty much the same claim: https://facia.ai/news/video-platforms-must-enforce-age-checks-or-face-massive-eu-fines/

I think dialysis damages the blood from what a web search suggests to me, so I doubt that would work non-stop.

Can they really replace the liver and the kidney long term? That would be news to me.

I think the mech hearts typically tend to lead to issues after a while. We're probably not quite there yet, so I've heard. (Not that I have any expert knowledge, at all.)

While true, I assumed we're talking current day technology!

I like science fiction so I find this interesting. I'm not qualified to answer, but while the skull is probably needed, probably not eyes and nose and jaw 🫥 right? And beyond that just neck to connect things and to swallow liquid food, and some parts of the torso. I guess the question then remains how much of the torso.

Some of the quotes in this article are not-the-onion levels of mindblowing:

He persisted anyway, before finding that Replit could not guarantee to run a unit test without deleting a database

How 🤣

🤫🤫🤫

A rolling back mechanism is the best thing to have for server tweaks. I achieve the same with docker. Something similar might be possible with FreeBSD Jails, podman, or anything similar like that. (Not that NixOS is a bad choice, I just wanted to share some more options for anybody looking for some to try.)

This is the most epic comment I've read on lemmy so far 😩👌

Right, but the article does. Anyway, I'm moving on. Thanks for the discussion.

you made us proud!

oh, is it? 👀

sadly, data that is too centralized and easily available will always be abused at some point. the recent US developments are showing this nicely.

you deserve a trophy 🏆 🥰

not that the recent governments care, they want to centralize most of the data of citizens now with pretty poor protections in a lot of cases. sads