fbn @ fbn @slrpnk.net Posts 1Comments 10Joined 5 mo. ago
You are correct.
Why didnt they introduce it when they were able to maybe pass it?
And when the fuck do you daydream that was?
How long have you been in national politics? Because it sounds like, y'know, not long.
This behavior sucks, you can do better.
you're right, i didnt read closely enough, a constitutional amendment is and would have been hot air at any time since the descision.
A law would be something that they might be able to get passed if they actually wanted to pass it, which they dont, because thats how they all got into power.
I agree, but i aint gonna stow it. Why didnt they introduce it when they were able to maybe pass it? Im not going to refrain from criticizing them just because worse people are in power.
would have been more useful when you had any kind of power to get a bill passed, but thanks anyway i guess
Why? I like how lemmy is now, why would we want to bring the people here that can't find their own way?
check my other post, i put it on the innerwebs
Who decides that the woman's life is at-risk enough to qualify as necessary? A panel of priests? The election police? A healthcare provider? The person whose life is on the line?
This seems to be the state health agencies clarifying the current rules. Not ideal, but hopefully only temporary until this law becomes unconstitutional.