Please do it and make a piracy sub.
These fucks have banned so many accounts for being left of "hunt the poors for sport" that it can't continue like this.
It's the ONLY reason to be in there.
Oh look, the kid with 0 ability to moderate his bot problem deciding to fight the lefties instead of somebody to the right of "hunt the poors for sport"
Fuck off w/ this nonsense 🤑🥾
Yes my instance is a bunch of dumb fucks... The mods are the worst offenders.
They also have 0 fucking idea how to sus out the bot farms. The moderators also don't have an ability to view their chat logs. If you message them >7 days later, they have NO context for what you said before.
I'm totally sure there were 5x the number of people who liked the OG post that drilled down 50 comments in a chain just to dunk on some "tankie"
300 upvote post 1200 upvote comment
NOTHING TO SEE HERE ;)
Appreciate it! Yeah everything that sounds like it would be easy, always has a fun extra hurdle on Fedora it seems haha.
Still loving it :)
So if I had to guess morethanevil, this is the line that ended up fixing it! Really appreciate it, because everything else seemed to fall into place after this:
setsebool -P samba_export_all_ro=1 samba_export_all_rw=1
I really appreciate all of your help Certainly_No_Brit! I had it set up in such a ridiculous way, but your assistance really helped me grasp why each guide was so wildly different (creation vs. adding a remote SMB on linux). After it worked, I could look up the network drive in Dolphin/Windows File Explorer in a very normal manner and can access all of the files :)!
Maybe your issue was with your firewall or permission in some regard unknowing8343? I still really prefer Windows' method (gag), but this was certainly very doable w/ the SELinux tweaks in the link above.
Gotcha I appreciate your patience w/ my silly questions lol
If the now correctly mounted folder is empty, is that a read/write issue for:
- the user on the remote machine
- the logged-in user on the local machine
- the user running the samba service?
Everything has been immeasurably easier on Linux. But holy fuck the Windows' Right Click -> Share is eons better than this :(
The configuration change in /etc/fstab is what stopped it being mounted correctly on boot. But is what was recommended for the SMB share.
I'm not sure I understand why it changes from MNT to Media based on the GUI's changes to the drive. If I have it auto-mount, it adds a 2nd listing like this:
//192.168.0.30/share /mnt/2666EE3966EE097F auto cifs username=user,password=1 0 0
/dev/disk/by-uuid/2666EE3966EE097F /mnt/2666EE3966EE097F auto nosuid,nodev,nofail,x-gvfs-show 0 0
Do I combine them in some fashion lol?
Did I misunderstand something?
No, I'm stupid :'(
Fedora 39 KDE DE Current Login: "User" with Password "1"
This allows me to connect to the share; however, it is "empty" on both the local and the remote machines.
I've followed at least 5-6 guides all w/ completely different instructions and would love somebody w/ experience on this to point to my fuck up and what I'm very clearly missing.
sudo nano /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
[share]
path = /mnt/2666EE3966EE097F/ writeable = yes browseable = yes public = yes create mask = 0777 public = yes guest ok = yes
sudo nano /etc/fstab
/dev/disk/by-uuid/D02A6F152A6EF7BC /mnt/D02A6F152A6EF7BC auto nosuid,nodev,nofail,x-gvfs-show 0 0 //192.168.0.30/share /mnt/2666EE3966EE097F cifs username=user,password=1 0 0
Dolphin also has this tab below (local machine w/ the mounted drive), but any password input doesn't do anything (the explorer flashes w/ no info about what the "Set Password" button did)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/18108733
> # As somebody who doesn't give one-iota-of-a-fuck about smoking weed or what you personally choose to do in your free time (veteran of the >3.5g a day squad): > > > It REALLY pains me to see users like Lemmy.World's FlyingSquid borderline killing themselves because quitting (even for 2 weeks) is too much to ask. > > Not only that, this user can afford the MAYO clinic in the states and yet somehow NOBODY (even the doctors) in his life has told him he should put it on pause (or at the bare minimum, try switching brands to see if pesticides are the issue, or even try changing the strain itself to see if his favorite sativa is actively working against his GI issues) > > Is this a rage bait account? He keeps posting random info about his medical issues (and specifically asks for advice) and then quite literally screams into his keyboard that they aren't doctors and that they don't know his particular situation. > > # Because I know you have an account over here as well Squid, If you haven't eaten for months and vomit every morning (and still smoke on a near constant basis) just consider reading the following: > > No Symptoms? Don't read this. Do whatever the fuck you want to. > > Again, I give 0 shits if you run yourself into the ground. But if you've ever thought "why does my stomach hurt so much every morning?..." perhaps consider a very brief pause just to see if it helps.
This was the CHS guy who refused to stop smoking right?
Legend. Thanks! Down the rabbit hole I go.
This was the CHS guy who refused to stop smoking right?
Looks like this would run Photoshop even better than my insane hacky wine setup too :')..
I guess a good followup would be, is there a tutorial for Fedora39 / Wayland / Nvidia that doesn't just inevitably nuke my system :)? I have an intel cpu/gpu in additional to my main card.
Also, if it's in pass-through mode, how would one set up the card for a game natively in Linux? (plenty of Steam games already run well on the card and I'm worried that this passthrough will run into issues of everything using the shitty intel gpu by default)
ELI5 if possible, thank you :)
I am 100% unaffiliated w/ OP, but I would guess they use Magnolia's bypass.
However; I am on v3.0.8.0 (2023-03-05), so I can't speak for anything newer than that out of his/her repo or in the extension mentioned.
A fun reminder: always read what your extensions can do before yolo-clicking a download by a burner account.