100% chocolate. Shoot I’m just eating straight chocolate chips. Again.
My goto travel games Sushi Go! Cockroach Poker
Honestly, I did not find that particularly convincing. Lot of typos and leaps in logic. The point is probably kind of true?!?
Honestly, I did not find that particularly convincing. Lot of typos and leaps in logic. The point is probably kind of true?!?
Steamable-in-the-bag, frozen vegetables were a game changer for me eating healthier while still being incredibly convenient.
Ding dongs: gross. Twinkies: disgusting. Ding dong Twinkies: nasty crap.
It’s missing a lot of things that people really care about (with good reason) like static typing. But I think a lot of dislike also comes from it being more of a functional programming language and not object oriented. I like it because it’s like scheme or lisp but with a C like syntax that I find easier to read. I also like that I can do dynamic stuff with websites. In some ways it’s the perfect scripting language for the web. Just as messy and unpredictable as html.
I mean that is the first step. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The next step is to start defining the types more strictly than any.
I like this question. Maybe Dionysus a god of ritual madness?
I like that Safari is not Chrome, since Apple’s core business isn’t search ads/tracking. I don’t like that WebKit is kind of the IE 6 of iPhones (only option and hard to develop against) I don’t use Firefox much, it’s always kind of been a mess (did they ever move on from XUIL or whatever it was called?). But Firefox is open source for real and I hope it can continue to be a very viable option.
My company requires either a code demo of existing code or a take home coding challenge. We get way too many people that cannot write code to not put that gate in place. It’s not even too terribly difficult or rigorous. Mostly looking for basic understand of fundamental things like DI, caching, background operations, etc.