Skip Navigation
AI Lie: Machines Don’t Learn Like Humans (And Don’t Have the Right To)
  • So is your comment. And mine. What do you think our brains do? Magic?

    edit: This may sound inflammatory but I mean no offense

  • Markdown everywhere
  • I’m vaguely aware of Org-mode but only as an alternative to Markdown. Last time I looked into it, though (years ago), Markdown seemed like a much better option for me for various reasons. Do you have a good argument for why Org-mode is a better choice for common use cases than the relatively universal GitHub-flavored Markdown?

  • Deleted
    *Permanently Deleted*
  • Hey, appreciate the update. That’s really too bad!

  • Hear me out: A scripting language that compiles to bash or sh (any suggestions?)
  • Okay at first I was pretty convinced that this was just the wrong way to accomplish what I thought your goal was. But now, after reading the StackOverflow post and your README, I think this is fascinating and frankly really awesome. What a clever and strange thing, using multiline comments that way, and string no-ops. I think just knowing this exists will cause me to find reason to use it.

  • The end of the Googleverse
  • I’ve been using Kagi. It works well. I like it. Costs money, but that’s a positive in my book.

  • Deleted
    *Permanently Deleted*
  • Okay, thanks for the explanation. Maybe I will keep watching, then. That gives me a little hope!

  • Deleted
    *Permanently Deleted*
  • Ugh, has the second season gotten better? I watched the first two episodes of the second season and was really disappointed… enough that I stopped watching. I didn’t mind that they veered so far from the book the first season, because it was inevitable and they did a great job capturing the feeling.

    But the second season is just bonkers and lots of sloppy writing so far. Totally unbelievable stunts for no reason other than suspense (that underwater scene and the mouth-to-mouth rebreathing, for example, was so stupid, and then they sit down and they’re like “phew, anyway”) and suddenly Hari is a split-consciousness main character and there’s forward time travel and no second foundation and two different types of non-psychohistory-developed psychic abilities and WE SEE THE IDENTITY OF THE MULE? Like, come on. In just two episodes they trashed some of the most compelling/thematic material and plot points of the original and turned it into a space-magic grab bag of action tropes.

    I’m mostly just salty. Perfectly fine if you enjoy it personally. But maybe some of these points resonate with you and, knowing them, you can convince me to keep watching? Because I did really like the first season.

  • The harmful ableist language you unknowingly use
  • I agree with you, but why are you disparaging kbin? Plenty of good discussion here, and a good community.

  • What do you call Marshmallow in your native language?
  • This one I can really get behind

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • You can repeat yourself all you want, but unless you can make an actual argument you kinda just look like an idiot

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • You can repeat yourself all you want, but unless you can make an actual argument you kinda just look like an idiot

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • I’m not even a communist, but I have, actually, and you clearly haven’t. Doesn’t take much to understand the philosophy.

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • USSR

    Yeah, this is precisely the kind of state I was talking about. Thanks for confirming. I’ve explained twice in responses to you, and you haven’t actually addressed my points, so maybe you don’t understand what I’m saying.

    The whole premise of Marxism and variations is to remove individual rights and freedoms

    If you think Marxism-Leninism actually represents what Marx laid out as communism, you are mistaken. Marxism-Leninism was just Stalin-branded autocratic socialism—Marx had no say in the name. Neither did Lenin, for that matter, unless I’m forgetting my history. This, again, is precisely what I was talking about.

    It doesn’t matter how you spin it

    I think you should go back and read my original comment and see that the whole point was to unravel the actual spin in this image. No matter how you spin it, this meme places an unwarranted amount of blame on Western leftists while describing each label inaccurately and with a traditionally right-wing slant.

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • That’s interesting, which country? I’d be willing to bet that the government does not actually describe itself as communist, but instead as a Marxist-Leninist socialist government, because even they know that what they do is not communism.

    I’m willing to bet that because most (if not all) “communist” states in the world actually describe themselves as socialist, not communist, following Marxism-Leninism or some variation thereof. As far as I know, all of them do. So, which one are you from?

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • So, not interested in discussing?

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • Sorry, would you please point out which statements in my comment you feel are opinion and not fact?

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • Of course I’m biased. Everyone is. But am I wrong? My accusation was not that OP is biased, but that the meme itself was trying to secretly promote a right-wing narrative. I understand if you don’t trust me as a biased observer, but you can still read my points and decide whether they are factually correct or not.

    If you think I’ve made an error, feel free to respond with a correction. I’m not here to flame anyone, just to point out that I see a vehicle for disinformation. I respect many philosophies on both the left and the right, even if I disagree with them, but regardless of “sides” everyone deserves to make informed decisions arrived at by their own reasoning. When you are manipulated without your knowledge, your ability to reason properly is taken away from you.

  • Know your genocide apologists
  • If you have not studied communism, and your main contact with communism is tankies on Lemmy and “communist” dictatorships in history, then I understand why you would think that.

    But communists by and large are not tankies, and do not wish for states like the USSR, China, or North Korea. Those people typically identify as Marxist-Leninists (promoted mainly by Stalin after Lenin died), and yep they’re authoritarian, and they’re loud. And, despite the name, Marx himself would disapprove of this ideology for a number of reasons.

    Read even just the first paragraph of the Wikipedia articles on ”Communism” and “Communist society.”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

    A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state (or nation state).

    Communists want no state; it is effectively a type of anarchist or radically democratic ideology, where the citizens all equally share power through common ownership of industry… the very opposite of authoritarianism.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_society

    A communist society is characterized by common ownership of the means of production with free access to the articles of consumption and is classless, stateless, and moneyless, implying the end of the exploitation of labour.

    The term communist society should be distinguished from the Western concept of the communist state, the latter referring to a state ruled by a party which professes a variation of Marxism–Leninism.

    Communism is not an authoritarian philosophy. If you go talk to people in real life who identify as communists, you will tend to find communists as described in these articles. If you look on lemmy.ml, however, you’ll find lots of Marxist-Leninists (tankies) because that’s who the instance was made by… but that’s not really representative of communism as a whole, and many communists find that philosophy repulsive.

  • keegomatic keegomatic @kbin.social
    Posts 0
    Comments 42