agreed! being able to unlock the phone while im pulling it out of my pocket was great. But the one place that fails is a phone sitting on a surface. i say give me two sensors! One one on the back and one under screen

I have had these permission issues in the past. Once I switched to mounting directly in the LXC they all went away.

One other difference is that findroid cannot transcode.

One other difference is that findroid cannot transcode.

I like using a specific finger. Guess which one wed all pick 😂

Sounds like potentially a DNS issue

Is that user correct? I get an error when I click on it.

Have you considered a travel router? I have a Gli.net travel router, and that can connect to an existing WiFi network and then you can create your own lan behind that. You can even configure it to use a VPN service if your concerned about your traffic on the existing WiFi.

If you're referring to Chromecast with Google tv, than there is absolutely an app! Give it another shot!

What is the best way to check max read/write speed? Here is the output from lspci. Do you see anything strange?

00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4e24 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation JasperLake [UHD Graphics] (rev 01) 00:04.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Dynamic Tuning service 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Device 4ded (rev 01) 00:14.2 RAM memory: Intel Corporation Device 4def (rev 01) 00:15.0 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Serial IO I2C Host Controller (rev 01) 00:15.2 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Device 4dea (rev 01) 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Management Engine Interface (rev 01) 00:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Device 4dd3 (rev 01) 00:19.0 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Device 4dc5 (rev 01) 00:19.1 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Device 4dc6 (rev 01) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4db8 (rev 01) 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4db9 (rev 01) 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4dba (rev 01) 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4dbc (rev 01) 00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4dbd (rev 01) 00:1c.6 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4dbe (rev 01) 00:1c.7 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4dbf (rev 01) 00:1e.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Device 4da8 (rev 01) 00:1e.3 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Device 4dab (rev 01) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4d87 (rev 01) 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Jasper Lake HD Audio (rev 01) 00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation Jasper Lake SMBus (rev 01) 00:1f.5 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Jasper Lake SPI Controller (rev 01) 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Silicon Motion, Inc. SM2263EN/SM2263XT SSD Controller (rev 03) 02:00.0 SATA controller: JMicron Technology Corp. JMB58x AHCI SATA controller 03:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Silicon Motion, Inc. SM2263EN/SM2263XT SSD Controller (rev 03) 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04) 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04) 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04) 07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04)

I struggle to find a motherboard and separate CPU that gives me better value that this. Neither of these are perfect but I think that offer plenty for my use as a NAS.

I'm very happy with my current N5105 board that I linked, even though it doesn't have any PCI slots. With 6 SATA and two M.2s I should be ok. If necessary I can add a 6 SATA M.2 adapter to get up to 12, which is definitely more than I need. If/when I get 10gbe I would have to upgrade either of these to get those speeds. Although a M.2 PCI riser with a 10gbe card would get me ~7gb so that is also an option.

Any thoughts on these two boards? I don't see any real disadvantages to the N100 board when compared to the N5105.

I will be running Truenas scale with ZFS, so will be installing 32GB of memory.

I realize a full size PCI slot would be better, but not really necessary for my application. Both have 6 SATA and two M.2s. I could put a 6 SATA/M.2 adapter in when I need more HDs. I'm really just comparing these two, and I don't really see any disadvantages to the N100 board.

It is listed at 32GB, but I've seen folks online who have installed more and tested it. Same 16GB limit listed with the N5105 that I currently have. I have 32GB on that and tested it.

This is great news!! A world stage for the NHLs best players can only help the NHL. I have non-hockey fan friends that will bring up US losing to Canada with Crosby's goal and even Oshies crazy shootout game

I don't think that's true that they are all free agents after this season. Is it?

Sorry I can't help with your question, but I wanted to ask what features you feel Jellyfin is missing that is keeping you on Plex? I've made the switch, and actually like Jellyfin better.

What do you mean by that? How does one make it slow?

Wow this is incredible, and I will be making the switch! This was the only unavailable feature that I couldn't go without.

Just went through this myself and settled on DIY build. Someone recommended this video, and I followed it very closely. The built was so easy and less expensive than off the shelf. I installed TrueNAS on it and couldn't be happier.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjDoQA4C22c