Just a note, I'm not American or familiar with how professional standards organizations work in the US and I just quickly skimmed the committee's report, so this is all broad strokes.

What the article missed is that the committee recommended that Clark's punishment include Clark having to prove he is fit to practice law before Clark can be readmitted after the two year suspension, not an automatic reinstatement after two years has elapsed. In my opinion, this is a very serious omission on the part of the CNN writer that makes the recommendation sound lighter than it actually is.

If the disciplinary committee's recommendation is implemented in full, Clark needs to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the state's professional standards organization that he understands how badly he behaved as a lawyer, why he was punished as a result, and how he must behave in the future to meet the professional standards of a licensed lawyer. If the professional standards board members in the future are extremely strict and set an unreachable bar for Clark (which, in my opinion, would not be surprising given the international coverage of this entire disaster), this could essentially be a permanent loss of license.

How strict the professional standards organization would interpret "fitness to practice" in two year's time or the correctness of the disciplinary board's finding that Clark's behaviour didn't rise to the same level as Giuliani's (partially because Clark wasn't filing lawsuits over this matter) thus warranting a lighter punishment is up for debate. The less cynical and more optimistic side of me interprets this as a permanent loss in practice with a crack in the door that is the size of one atom if Clark can prove with absolute certainty he turned things around and spends his waking hours repenting for his misdeeds, is now an absolutely flawless example of how an ethical lawyer should behave, and uses any spare moment he has rescuing all the abandoned puppies and kittens in the world and finding them amazing forever homes. Realistically? Who knows. Two years is long enough that people forget and won't be outraged if the organization's requirements are low.

Oh that's a good idea. Rhodia is pretty cheap around here. I completely forgot it comes in anything but dot grid! Something new to add to my cart, thanks.

Rhodia only sells in pads and small notebooks unfortunately. It's a shame because I like their paper as a jack of all trades paper. Clairefontaine does looseleaf. I have used their notebook paper and liked it a lot. I put an order in for their Triomphe paper yesterday. I'm not sure if it's the same paper that they use in the notebooks. I will find out soon! I finally found some CAL looseleaf and ordered that too. I've used it in notebook format and loved it. I'm waiting to put in an order for Midori pads and will probably toss the TR52gsm in the cart while I'm at it now that you've given me the nudge. Have you used G. Lalo? It is a bit pricy, so I'm not sure if it's worth trying.

I use TR68 regularly, but I've been hesitant to use TR52 for letters because of the ghosting as I'm a fan of wet nibs, dark inks, and conserving paper by using both sides. I guess I should just buy a few sheets and try it at the very least. I just wish I could find a good source of 68gsm loose leaf in Canada.

Oh that's a great idea. I have a ream of coated paper designed for ink jets I could try!

I've used Midori MD notebooks before and liked the paper. I had no idea they came in writing pads. Definitely getting added to my paper order!

Unfortunately, I'm not in the UK, but I night be willing to see if they ship if I can find enough to make a big order. The slight texture sounds interesting.

Wow, I will have to add this one to the list. I didn't expect Clairefontaine to ever work with a guide sheet!

Reminds me of a quote I have always enjoyed:

"We know no spectacle so ridiculous as the British public in one of its periodical fits of morality." Thomas B. MacCaulay

My go to is TR 68gsm. I really love CAL too. I have no idea what I will replace them with yet since they both are discontinued. I enjoy Midori MD, but I wish it came in ivory. For notepads I use as scratch pads, I use Rhodia since it's relatively cheap and FP friendly.

That being said, I am in the middle of trying out new paper to replace my go to paper. So far I like Maruman Nmemesoine, but the lack of non-spiral bound notebook variety is a big sticking point. Kokuyo Perpernap is up next. I have high hopes.

I'm told the latest iteration of TR is very close to old TR classic 52gsm. I guess that will be my fallback.

I am digging the Misty Blue. It's work friendly, but that slightly lighter blue black has more personality than a darker one that leans closer to black. It's on my wishlist now!

I have a hybrid system. I use a combination of both depending on context. In the end though, it all gets loaded into Obsidian unless it is work related. It makes it easier to decide what is important enough to keep and archive in a searchable format.

Usually something very information heavy like lectures will go directly to digital. I have a hard time keeping up in a legible way if I try to do it by hand.

Fast notes and anything that I can take my time with will go onto pen and paper. Same with when I'm away from my desk. I hate taking notes with my phone in general. The only exception is if the note contains a URL beyond the basic name.domain type deals. I do this stuff by hand because scribbling a note when I'm out is faster than getting the phone out and opening a notes app. When I'm at the desk, it is just nice to slow down and think about what I'm writing some times. Other times it's just easier to grab a writing utensil and scribble down contact information in a full screen application or on the phone.

As people have already pointed out, this is clearly not an issue of the effects of testosterone on the body. So you are right in the sense that this policy can only be defensible on equity grounds.The overlooked issue with the argument that the organization is providing an equitable space for feminine presenting individuals coming up through a system that is overwhelmingly make dominated is that under the current policy, transmen are having their women's titles stripped from them unless they officially change their designations back to women. Only then, their awards would be restored. Suddenly presenting as male due to testosterone does not immediately negate the past experiences. If this policy is really about recognizing the challenges of climbing the ladder in chess as a feminine presenting individual, then these transmen who are also transitioning later in life should be allowed to keep their hard earned titles. Unfortunately, this policy is not actually about acknowledging the challenges of being a feminine presenting chess player. It smells like the organization wants to be able to claim they are acting equitably without thoroughly thinking about the logic of the policy. Whether people like the policy or not, or whether it is morally right or wrong is irrelevant. Well-crafted, consistent policy is much easier to defend. This policy is neither well thought out or consistent.