Honestly this is the problem with all road infrastructure. It'll be interesting to see how countries like China manage it. China currently has the largest paved-road system in the world, and maintaining that will not come cheap.

The Senkaku Islands, also known as the Diaoyu Islands, are claimed by both the PRC and ROC as an island chain under the Yilan County of Taiwan.

The historical context for this island claim is the most absurd: neither the PRC nor ROC were invited to the San Francisco Peace Treaty talks with Japan. A few months prior, the ROC's Chiang Kai-Shek had signed the Potsdam Declaration with Allied leaders and explicitly declared which islands Japan could hold sovereignty over (the Senkakus were, notably, excluded). However, de facto sovereignty was overseen by the US until 1972, when the Okinawa Reversion shifted sovereignty to Japan.

If there is one territorial claim where the PRC and ROC are in the right with, it's this one... Not the random claims the ROC has with Mongolia, Pakistan, Russia, Bhutan, Myanmar, Afghanistan, or Tajikistan (for which the PRC has negotiated and settled with), but for this attempt by Allied powers to ostracize a weak China and discredit the sacrifice of Chinese lives post-WW2.

Taiwanese support for Israel exceeds Taiwanese support for Palestine by more than 2:1.

The fact that Moscow Metro is up there despite Moscow being so fucking cold is wild

Nukes are an inevitability following sanctions. North Korea was sanctioned to hell and back by major international players before they developed nukes... At that point, they really might as well go all the way. The same is true for Iran, and the same will be true for any upcoming player with nukes.

The weaponization of sanctions for political gain rather than to act as a counterbalance against actual world-ending threats will be the death of us.

The Altius 600 weighs 27 pounds and carries a maximum payload of 7 pounds. The Lancet weighs 12kg (~26 pounds) and carries a maximum payload of 3kg (~6.6 pounds).

What are you smoking?

Have you ever tried starting up a car that's been sitting for a year?

That should tell you all you need to know about the reliability of digger man

You're completely forgetting the most important part...

China has already shown that they're willing to negotiate (e.g. the Gulf of Tonkin with Vietnam, which was favourable to the Vietnamese).

With regards to the Paracels, Vietnam holds claims solely as leverage in the Spratlys. Vietnam lacks any control over the Paracels and has not supported American FONOPS through the Paracels for that reason alone. Vietnam knows that their claim to the Spratlys is strong. Vietnam has been escalating their island-building in the Spratlys for that exact reason. From what I can tell, Vietnam is trying to secure partial or total jurisdiction over the Spratlys in exchange for yielding the Paracels. Unfortunately, until Vietnam/China obtain exclusive co-sovereignty in the region, such an agreement is impossible.

Your yummy democratic genocide vs. my disgusting authoritarian "cultural genocide"

The collapse of the modern Italian state as we know it lmao

Nobody commenting on this has ever visited Xinjiang. Nobody writing these articles has ever visited Xinjiang. Can you blame people for listening to the media they have access to?

There's a funny thing about the notion of media literacy in China vs. the US: in China, media literacy is mostly "what is the media not telling me?" while in the US, media literacy is mostly "which media source is telling me the right thing?"

You're not allowed to set up a territorial military outpost in EEZ lol

IIRC you're not allowed to set up territorial military outposts in EEZ, so OP is correct that the Philippines government is violating international law.

sigh

You know what the biggest cities in Xinjiang are? Urumqi, Korla, Aksu, Karamay. Those are some Chinese sounding names /s

Note that some towns have been switched to a Mandarin standard. This is especially true when Han populations dominate a particular city (e.g., Shihezi, set up by a Chinese general in 1951), or when a city relies on tourism from other provinces (e.g., Beitun, a ski towm). But... That's not what the article is discussing, really. The article is much more interested in Romanization of these names.

Officially, the Uyghur name shares equal right as the Chinese one, however, sometimes the Uyghur Romanization is a pain in the ass to pronounce while the Chinese one is far easier (Ürümqi vs. Wulumuqi). This is as true in Xizang as it is in Xinjiang (the name བོད་ is still used to refer to Xizang by official Chinese standards, but that doesn't phonetically map to Tibet). Of course, people are forgetting that English is neither the first nor second most common language in Xinjiang... In fact, given the number of ethnic minorities I doubt it's even on the list. The English name is selected for convenience rather than anything else because nobody except Western tourists will ever use it.

There's an interesting debate happening today in Canada as to whether this Romanization makes sense: while First Nations names like Squamish and Tsawwassen have been Romanized and are used colloquially, First Nations groups oppose Romanization because of its association with colonialism and instead would prefer names like "šxʷƛ̓ənəq Xwtl'e7énḵ". The question is, which do you keep as the English public-facing name?

Of course, this is coming from the same The Guardian that reported that "the last major mosque in China lost its domes and minarets" when the Afaq Khoja and Id Kah exist and are widely known as holy sites in Uyghur Islam. The Guardian's reporting on China has consistently been sloppy because they don't have a correspondent in Xinjiang and their editorial teams don't speak Chinese or Uyghur.

Are we ignoring how China's top EU exports are made up by MG (a British brand) and Volvo (a Swedish brand)? How Mercedez-Benz partnered with BYD to release the hybrid GLC? How Stellantis partnered with Leapmotor?

Chinese carmakers are already sharing technology with Europe. All this tariff serves to do is push them to sell hybrids, which are excluded from the tariff.

You're not entirely correct: China had heavily subsidized their EV industry.

The purchase incentive is gone. Many tax incentives are gone. Tax benefits for setting up factories are gone (closed ICE factories are being decommissioned rather than sold).

If you had said that in 2019, you'd be entirely correct. Today? Things are different.

For fucks sake China sells their cars for export at a 40% markup compared to the domestic market. At-cost my ass

There's too many boring US/China news stories. Just because an article talks about the US or China (superpowers) does not make it interesting on its own.

and you're complaining about the batteries lmfao

BBC is on a roll today