The fuckhole is going to finally serve some time. He can never be referred to as anything but a convicted felon from now on. Rot in hell, maggotbag. LOL
Boeing's long and storied past is just that: past. Boeing today is nothing like Boeing before the merger. Like all capitalist organizations, they've hollowed out the mine of reputation for short term bonuses given to the 1% and in doing so have sold off the company's biggest asset - it's name - and its association with safety and safely designed and built aircraft.
The part that really sucks is when Boeing inevitably implodes and files Ch 11 it will leave Airbus a monopoly on passenger aircraft.
LOL!!! I actually had to look that up. I'm so glad they're finally hauling is carcass off to a real prison.
I wish this surprised me.
It does not.
It does explain a good deal about how Thomas comports himself, his righteous entitlement, his insatiable greed, and his willingness to be a moral Gumby doll.
One step closer to the abyss.
The United States of America used to be thought of as an ideal, an aspiration. Now? It's a shithole backwater filled with toothless grins and guns that anyone with a sane mind wants to avoid like the plague. The USA is the punchline to the joke: "What happens when you give an AK-47 to a chimp?"
Vermont State Police did not have a comment
LOL, the pigs fuck up, the state shuts up and the taxpayers pay up.
1312
Local media have reported that Jaswal resigned from the police force in 2022
The assault(s?) took place in 2011 - he was an active pig for eleven years after the reported crime he committed. What are the odds the assault was the only crime.
ACAB
Boebert faces first election Tuesday since switching districts and the vaping scandal hand-job scandal with her exhibitionist-in-front-of-underage-girl-husband.
FTFY, but you might need a smaller font size to fit it in.
Another Con con.
First off, taxpayers fork out good money for staff researchers for all parties so what they present is factual and responsible. Unfortunately, this PC dandy didn't like, didn't want, or didn't ask for anything reality-based. Much better to use a shitty app for flawed and deceitful results to inflame the base. You know the base, the 2% of people across the country who aren't worried about fact or figures, just how they feel. Unless the feeling is empathy, then they're stone cold; dead on the inside.
Secondly, and inconveniently, it has been a historically proven fact that Cons increase deficits, lower monetary value and raise middle class taxes not to pay for expanded defence or social programs, but to make certain their election-funding mega-rich class enjoy all the perks of living in a polite society with paying one goddamn red cent for the privilege.
"Another island, Galen?"
"Yes."
"Here you go. It looks like your penis is flaccid, let me get that for you"
And so on, and so on, and so on...
Think of the worshippers of fine carpentry, who drink sacramental varnish. A horrible end. But a lovely finish.
Not dead, "received an unexpected early heavenly reward". And if it was catholics or protestants, same. If it was hindu's they'd have prematurely transcended. Pastafarians? Over cooked. All religions are risible!
They like gay softcore?
If they weren't consistently stupid, the MAGAt's would really have nothing to bind them.
"Fuck her" for being exactly what she is? Anyone elected to any position has to be, by definition, amoral and selfish. Now she is being blatant about it, that's all - she's the incumbent and doesn't have to worry about re-election (google "running for versus running as" and you'll see the many advantages of running while being in office) so she displays her true colours. Fuck the dolts who thought she'd be different.
In Canada (and flying overseas) a blade 4" or less was ok. BTW, the boxcutters used on 9/11 were 3" blades, so we're paying for security theatre at this point in funding CBSA or the TSA.
So Xacto knives are ok on a plane. Would slicing out the screen edges shut it down?
A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. Wikipedia