There sure are a lot of people around this post more concerned with "inaccuracy" than politicians calling queer people faggots.
"That doesn't mean they deserve to be insulted" is a perfectly fine question, but that's not what the post said.
"Smallpox only kills the disabled and the elderly. We need to get back to normal!"
If she changed her mind, why isn't she saying or doing anything about the border wall and the internment camps? She's the VP, she has Biden's ear and can exert tremendous pressure on policy-makers.
I would be willing to accept the possibility of her views changing if there was any evidence her views have changed. I haven't seen any evidence though, and so I think the safest assumption is that she's still the same woman that kept people in prison past the end of their sentence and denied healthcare to trans people in prison.
That's exactly the opposite of what I was saying.
The only reason people listen to her is because people keep thinking there's any kind of discussion to be had here. There isn't.
Is there something wrong with being called trans?
Because ironically the bias checking bot is biased. MBFC is pretty terrible, as evidenced by giving LGBTQ Nation a "medium" credibility rating.
They're being "mean" because you're jumping to assumptions that a brown woman is cheating because she was very good at a sport, and all your comments are laced with transphobic undertones. There is zero evidence to suggest Imane Khelif cheated, but you keep acting like there is.
How many people have had to surrender within a minute (not a knockout or pin)?
A lot, actually. It's a violent sport, it happens all the time. Ronda Rousey famously had a match called in under a minute by a ref because she was so seriously outmatched, it doesn't mean her opponent was cheating or trans.
But they still didn't allow trans people to compete this year. So I guess the IOC thinks transphobia is fine except when it's directed at cis people.
I would genuinely rather work with a doctor who just got divorced than have to fight the invisiable AI blackbox that calls me a drug addict for being chronically ill.
You can’t just grab a hundred doctors and ask them “have you ever denied care due to your biases against women?” because the bad ones will either lie or not realize what they have done.
Unlike Narxcare, which just denies care due to biases and won't tell you why because it's a machine learning blackbox. There is no "paper trail" for NarxCare, because denying care to patients is the point. I can at least argue with doctors, or request a new one.
You can't fix social issues with technology, and every attempt will just make things worse for the affected people.
Honestly that just leads to automation with built-in bias, and now you can't even threaten a doctor with a malpractice suit because you can't talk to a person, or the only person you can talk to says "sorry, the computer won't let me".
You can't use technology to fix social issues. People keep trying, and every time it just hurts chronically ill and disabled people even more. Have you ever heard of NarxCare?
NarxCare is a prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) run by Bamboo Health. Bamboo Health was formerly known as Appriss. It is widely used across the United States by pharmacies including Rite Aid as well as those at Walmart and Sam’s Club. The NarxCare software allows doctors to view data about a patient, combining data from the prescription registries of various U.S. states to make the registries interoperable nationally. It also uses machine learning to generate an "Overdose Risk Score" that potentially includes EMS and criminal justice data; these scores have been criticized by researchers and patient advocates for the lack of transparency in the process as well as the potential for disparate treatment of women and minority groups.