Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TE
Posts
7
Comments
1,745
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I think that was them drawing a line on eol windows. They cut both 7 and 8.1 at the same time. Could just be the policy now.

    Part of me wants them to take the opportunity to push people to switch to Linux, the other part of me thinks that will be perceived no differently from msft's badgering about win11.

  • Maybe you don't understand it, but that doesn't mean you don't rely on it. If I said an OS was unusable by 99% of people because it didn't support multithreading, it doesn't matter if 99% of people know what multithreading is, that's clearly a true statement. Similarly, if you've ever expected your PC to have the same files on it tomorrow that you put on it today, then you might find it annoying when that's not the case.

  • No one is trying to play games on those vista machines, though. Valve pulled steam support for win 7 and 8.1 over a year ago because they were EOL. If they also pull support from win 10 once it's EOL, then people will need to make a change to keep playing their games. If msft refuse to support existing hardware with win11, then many people will be forced to choose between buying a new laptop/PC, or trying Linux.

  • i prefer google maps yet i still don't want google and make do with OSM

    Do you see the important difference between your example of preference and mine? My preference is a specific set of features, yours is a specific product.

    fork it

    Hah, I felt I already poked a dozen holes in that position. If you'd like to actually back up your position, I welcome it.

    and an active discord

    You keep bringing up their discord like that's relevant to me. It's not.

    im going to overlook the problematic maintainer im going to give clout to

    Yeah, I'm fully convinced you didn't read my previous comment. For the record, I'm not downvoting you because I disagree with you, I think it's valid to criticize others in the community for their behaviour, and I respect that. I'm going to downvote you because you're not contributing to the discussion.

  • I agree they're restrictive and arbitrary reasons and they're also the reasons every single hyprland user has for chosing it. You have a different set of arbitrary reasons for setting your system up the way you like. It's called a "preference".

    In order to fulfill this preference, is it ok for me to fork hyprland and call it something else? Or do I need to rewrite hyprland's functionality from scratch and pretend it was all my idea? Can I reference hyprland during the rewrite or does it need to be clean room? Should i make a fork available for people who disapprove of the hyprland devs? But what if I'm not a good enough person? Oof, just noticing, i forgot to check the ideologies of each maintainer of the thousands of packages in my system.

    I think it's possible that the boycott idea makes more sense in a capitalist setting than a communist one. The reason we stop supporting JK Rowling or Chick-Fil-A is because being a customer directly translates to their success and thus the success of their ideology. But no one is making a profit from developing and maintaining a Linux package. In fact, typically the more people use your package, the more thankless work falls on you.

    I'm simply interested in having control over my PC, and the FOSS community exists to exchange learnings and code to enable each other to do that. And like all of science throughout history, there are problematic people who contribute useful ideas, and I think we would be cutting off our own noses to reject those ideas just because they come from people we otherwise disagree with.

  • Consider that it's not intended to be helpful, but actually could be a malicious DDOS attempt. If it slows down devs from fixing real vulnerabilities, then it empowers those holding zero days for a widely used package (like curl).

  • Actually, the Signal protocol turned out to be fatally flawed in that, if you added the editor of a major publication to your group chat, all of your conversations would end up on the news the next day. Honestly a pretty egregious vulnerability.

  • Heh, I'm probably in the minority, but I like the idea of different windows "modes". I've long wanted msft to make versions of windows for different users rather than a one-size-fits-all product. I just wanted it because I'm a power user who wanted something more stripped down and configurable, not a boomer who wants something that won't act as a conduit between my ignorance and scammers.

    But it's cool, they can do whatever they want with windows now, they've made it clear they don't want me as a user.

  • Ah, like a "stable" mode? Honestly it makes sense from a user support perspective. More locked down, more predictable, easier to secure. In the same way that you can't hack a brick, and similarly useful.