Quick! Name a cheap import!
I hated downvotes on Reddit because like merely 5 would silence all anti honeymoon's sentiment. This place, your can have a million downvotes but the comment is still there so i just count em as engagement points. Someone felt strongly, that means i wrote something worth reading in a way
Fair. I just have personal beef with jarjar. Feels like nails on chalkboard, no way around it
Yeah i hate this guy, saw the piece on him by John Oliver. But i don't see how he gains by backing this. Perhaps this is his broken clock time to be right?
Colorado already allows unaffiliated s to vote in all primaries iirc. Maybe this could be leveraged against the public in some way i cannot see, but that's moot imo since our current system is rigged to hell already
I got curious and tried it. What does this mean?
Got a source that isn't some mongrel barking the words of the Israel State which is currently engaged in genocide? Cuz i have lots of sources calling this a genocide, and just you saying "naw actually hamas stuck a stick in their own bike wheel."
I can get chill and watch 5 of the 6. I refuse the jar jar movie. I heard his goddamn patois one time in theaters and it was more than enough.
I like the alternate order which mixes the two trilogies together: ep 4,5,2,3,6. No ep 1! boooooo!
I was a kiddo and i loved the ewoks. I even watched the terrible, terrible ewoks cartoon and Loved it. Eeeecheee waa waa baby!
Sorry, Lucas did that shit for lil babies like me and i ate it up.
Even if we're in the start trek timeline it's still bad news for you me n mine lol
Do not, my friends, become addicted to piss. It will take hold of you, and you will resent its absence
What a quaint question. I honestly wonder if I'll live my full life and die with a dignity instead of how i suspect, with a fistfull of dirt and a pigs boot on my skull.
Faith baby! pure, Colombian uncut hopium
Nah it's you. definitely polcom type 14.
type mostly pretends to understand politics but just say vague pleas to emotion or le-reddit-insults.
CNBC or whoever coos in these types ears about how much smarter and better they are for being Democrats and well, not fucking much else.
You'll never admit that you only watch tv news sometimes after work while browsing your phone? No one would, on purpose. But sometimes they show it.
I see ya homie and i genuinely want you to shut the fuck up since by now you've probably figured out my my fucking trigger is arrogant, ignorant liitle shits.
Then rather than engaging in an emotional battle, read the content of his statements and judge their veracity as an idea separate from the man. If motive is impossible to discern from the data you have, you need more data, right? At least if you know what it is that he is accusing the govt of, specifically, will help to determine more of the motivations behind his choice, right?
I'm not saying read them and believe them, but rather cast your critical eye upon his focus, and then perhaps you can poke holes in his conclusions or discern what, if he's lying, those lies are meant to achieve
Sounds like a business model to me. if i didn't pirate everything i'd sign up anyway
Before or at the same time as we fix sub-minimum wage, we need to also address the disability benefits cliff.
Agreed, especially the bolded part. There's absolutely no reason we can't do both.
C'mon, we are in a privacy sub. Maybe you should take your frustration with me to pms and ill help you out, privately. The need to fluff your feathers for the others in the room is distracting you.
The important thing for you to consider is if i did, would what i just said be less true? I invite you to consider this, and not in an Internet fight way where we flex our shit talking muscles at each other, but in a "hey, maybe there is a point worthy of debate" kinda way.
Like id be interested in considering the point that "the messenger does matter. I'm sure there are cases, but they'd be extreme cases to my mind.
