It seems the libs were left out. Auth-conservative Macron chose to continue as is
Exactly, we should assume that any international representation is not transparent
Tbh the flip flopping and counter effective comments do make the stances unclear
They do justify a lot of anti-communism for an assumed Marxist. US and Israel fascism is clear, it's the rest they seem to have apologia towards.
Blading. Trump could've easily razored his own ear open like wrestlers do.
Sad and yet not surprising as the external influence achieved the shift to the right
Kerala and Rojava really give hope that not everything is co-opted against true principles
That's a big leap you have there. It's not wise to assume alternate intentions to what I wrote as such an evaluation is not accurate. I don't think Ukraine is attempting to reach Moscow for a total victory and I'd never make such a claim either.
I wasn't the one bringing up total victory. I don't know what level of invasion is their true intention, nor claim to know.
The libs don't even have a candidate in that country's weird election format. It's a tough say that the lesser shit is ideal.
Lurking this thread and chiming in, but I don't know. Is it because of accelerationism? A faster collapse is quite harmful to many
Yeah it's tough to find a compromise when Russia seems to go for the total victory or at least a settlement of gains and Ukraine hopes for a stalemate without border changes.
The war is a classic example of fascist infighting
I'm sorry this instance has problematic relationships with some capitalist overlords being favoured but you are correct.
Sources like The Guardian, Reuters, Telegraph, CNN, BBC are sometimes allowed and sometimes removed on rule 1.
The latter case is usually evident while lurking and finding a deep long comment thread. Sometimes one user there has deleted messages and there's another's rule 3 content comments left. Apparently these cases seem to usually be mutual rule 3 but it looks like they're treated differently.
It is somewhat opaque how sometimes the rules apply and sometimes they don't, like news sources on rule 1, and iirc rule 3 in general. Deleting content should have the mod informing the user and the rest community what happened and have a way for the users to manage mistakes, be it either accidental rule breaks by the user or wrongful modding.
I usually just lurk and post only if I see a topic which doesn't seem to be posted yet. Seems like eastern police state & oligarchy has been that lately, and I think it's definitely something that is interesting from a communist human rights point of view. I don't know if they're taboo topics or just happenstance that I saw two of these lately before they hit here.
Yup. Surprised me as well. I've thought of it being an ok enough source, just apply normal media criticism. But Lemmy doesn't have transparency on whose mod decision it was or how to report those which seem to be on false premises or accidentally... Maybe some day.
The Guardian is not allowed on this community as per rule 1
Ms Qu Jing posted a series of clips in May on Douyin describing her tough treatment of junior colleagues. Read more at straitstimes.com.
LLM summary:
The Czech Republic's transport minister warns of Russia's attempts to disrupt European rail networks, suspected to be part of a campaign to destabilize the EU. Thousands of hacking attempts, including attacks on signalling systems, have been made since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. While the Czech Republic has managed to defend against these attacks, concerns remain about potential accidents. Similar attacks have targeted railway companies in Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Estonia. Prague is taking measures to strengthen cybersecurity and limit foreign involvement in critical infrastructure projects, advocating for more EU funding for transport infrastructure to address increasing demand and alleviate strain on conventional operators.