Skip Navigation
Donald Trump found guilty in historic New York hush money case
  • No, I got my answer: You're a coward.

    Good coping, jackass. You were looking for a gotcha moment and instead got egg on your face.

    Its okay, child, the mean, disingenious person will stop bothering you and hurting your fee fees with snark.

    The conversation didn't go the direction you wanted to. I'm sorry you feel that way. You don't have the intellectual maturity to engage in good faith conversations and that's something you need to sort out yourself.

  • Donald Trump found guilty in historic New York hush money case
  • If you're going to spend all this time, lets just hear your answers.

    I can spend my time addressing how disingenuous you are.

    Lets give you the benefit of the doubt, assume its an error and you're not a liar who is such a coward about sharing their opinion they would rather accuse people repeatedly of responding in bad faith to poison the discussion than answer a simple pair of snarky questions honestly.

    You searched through this sub to find someone to answer your snarky questions. If you were being sincere, I don't think you would ask in the way you did.

    Again, why pretend you're actually interested in having a civil discourse when you started off on the wrong foot? And you clearly picked the wrong person since I'm not a conservative as what you asked are conservative values.

    Perhaps you should rethink how you approach others with political disagreements next time. Cause this sounds like a skill issue on your part.

  • Donald Trump found guilty in historic New York hush money case
  • not interesting

    competency is only your opinion

    So just say you think he's competent despite all evidence.

    You're conflating two separate points I made because naturally, you cannot fathom why "Family Values" isn't interesting to me, but I understand why you did it.

    This is your opportunity to explain yourself and you keep responding which says you want to address ... something.

    Explain myself for what? I'm not a conservative. You used ™ in your snarky post because you assumed I was a conservative - because those are their values .

    Either way, my motivation here is curiosity. Answer, don't answer, but I will keep poking until you decide its not worth your time to keep waffling.

    I'm responding to you only because I know you're being disingenuous. So why are you pretending like you actually care?

  • Donald Trump found guilty in historic New York hush money case
  • That's a lot of words to not answer either question.

    I explained why. And you're not asking in good faith either.

    I would imagine anyone voting for somebody would be able to answer why they think their candidate was competent.

    People vote on certain issues and the ones you mentioned aren't interesting to me. And competency is only your opinion. You hate people who are voting for Trump so why are you pretending like you really care to know the answers to these questions?

  • Donald Trump found guilty in historic New York hush money case
  • This doesn't rank high in my priorities. You'll need to ask an actual conservative - Trump and I aren't conservatives.

    Though, I'm thinking you're a bad faith jackass looking through your comments and the sarcastic approach to your questioning.

    Are you really out here trying to own the MAGAs? Lmao

  • Youtube send a Letter to Grayjay Creator
  • YouTube legal wants Futo to release apis and user data to them as they believe Grayjay is violating their terms.

    Grayjay doesn't store user data nor is it using their APIs so the terms don't apply

    Futo will not be removing Grayjay and won't be complying with a request that cannot be fulfilled.

    Other details:

    • YouTube Premium's download feature still requires an Internet connection to access content downloaded.

    • Louis makes the point of being tired of paying for products and services that end up giving you less and less, which is part of the reason why Grayjay was created

    • Content creators shouldn't fear of being banned by an temperamental AI that could cripple their livelihood without an explanation which Grayjay attempts to solve as viewers can still access their content on Rumble, Twitch and other platforms if they get banned on Youtube.

    Good on Louis for sticking to his guns.

  • Youtube send a Letter to Grayjay Creator
  • Because Grayjay allows users to follow others across multiple platforms such as Rumble, Odyssey and Twitch. So if they get banned off YouTube, they will still be able to access content on other platforms.

    And with Grayjay, you can download these videos and access them without needing to connect to the internet which is required for YouTube Premium despite the content being downloaded on the YouTube app.

    I'm not quite following what is your confusion when he outlined the problem Grayjay is trying to solve.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)UN
    unwaveringegg @endlesstalk.org
    Posts 0
    Comments 13