I'm not saying they'll do it, I'm saying it's incorrect to state that there's no valid strategic target when there absolutely is.

Ukraine?

Striking inside their territory won't matter all that much if they can just nuke Kiyv.

And breaking the nuclear taboo is a catastrophe for everybody, regardless of who the target is.

If Ericsson was a person they'd struggle to dress themselves

Which muscle does the strain-to-reach-the-tv-remote train?

If you use one of those drone jammers what's to stop a drone homing in on the source of the jamming and exploding?

All the probing is just backpay that's accumulated a lot of interest.

f they can determine your browser was associated with some set of unique IDs, then they can track you

The only scenario in which this could happen would leave both strategies equally vulnerable.

No, the idea is that you can't be traced via fingerprinting.

Both strategies accomplish that.

Plenty of people are looking at the data, reaching the conclusion that Biden realistically can't beat Trump, and calling for an alternate strategy.

They'd say your aim was a fucking stupid one, because they see running Biden as a sure path to Trump, versus an admittedly unlikely but still possible hail-mary of running a different candidate.

You and 1000 friends go to a party all dressed in the same Mr Blobby costume. When one of you gets absolutely shitfaced at the open bar and vomits in the middle of the dance floor, they get kicked out and banned from next week's rager. Next week rolls around, and 1001 Mr Blobbys rock up on on the dance floor, because management has no idea which Mr Blobby cost them their deposit last week.

You and 1000 friends all go to a party dressed as a unique DeviantArt Sonic OC. One of you fails to hold their liquor. They get kicked out. You all attend the party next week all wearing a completely different costume of a completely different DeviantArt Sonic OC, since the number of them is functionally infinite. Management can't kick the vomiteer out because as far as they're concerned, Jimmy the Hedgehog didn't show up this week, because whoever was Jimmy the Hedgehog is now Steve the Echidna.

If it's unique every time it means they can't create a consistent fingerprint for you.

A UUID assigned to each user is unique, but that's not useful for tracking unless you can ensure each user keeps the same number across visits.

I don't think the comment you replied to justifies the level of scrutiny you're putting it under.

Polling post-debate more or less justifies what it says.

I don’t answer questions from people who can’t answer my own.

You didn't ask a question.

If you think the only reason people would be against Biden running at this point is because they're secret Republican shills, I genuinely think you may need to spend more time offline.

If EFF always says your browser has a unique fingerprint then that means the anti-fingerprinting is working, no?

I have to ask: are you just ignorant of the position of the anti -Biden crowd, or are you intentionally misconstruing it as them preferring Trump over Biden?

I think you might care about this a touch too much

But only because of an incredible amount of panicking behind the scenes at the absolute last minute.

VS Code is written with performance in mind. Compared with other electron apps, it's very performant.

Compared with even a sloppily written native app though, it's not great.

It will take like a decade to get the crustiest of industries up to standard, so you need to preempt.

Y2k was the most scheduled "tech disaster" that could feasibly exist and was still a mess.

IPv6 adoption is still in the toilet.