A good thing in general, maybe this will help improve compatibility with old stuff and its old bugs, cause it'll be simpler to emulate those bugs with cleaner code.
BTW, has anyone managed to run Rogue Squadron 3D under Wine? I'm just interested, I'm having that menu input bug not allowing to do anything.
Void user here, the feeling is similar to looking out of the window on a good day to look at some minor road incident.
Agree about SUSE, it's really amazing.
Yes, Debian and also Gentoo. Slackware may not be dead, but out of race in the sense of being a stabilizer as one of the "main" (culturally, not in numbers) distributions, and Arch has lost most of sanity it had (not much to begin with).
Same as any ports system. Though yes, for Linux the alternatives may seem less convenient like Portage or less extensive like Pkgsrc.
So sad for Sun. Just touching their products as they were before getting eaten by Oracle is an amazing experience.
Also very nice artistic language in visual design, I know this is not the most important thing.
I mean, RH became dominant by not initially being a bag of dicks.
So if SUSE becomes the main enterprise vendor (to more precisely address RH's role, one can say "root enterprise vendor"), then its enshittification is just a matter of time.
Other than that, I like Tumbleweed, it just works, and, unlike Fedora, without bullshit.
Still the whole corporate atmosphere makes me wary. SUSE is good, we just shouldn't put all our eggs into one basket (and should fix that with RH).
I just listen to the "Enclave Sublevel" track (more rarely others) from KotOR II OST, or sometimes "Bastila Shan" track (more rarely others) from KotOR OST, or "Polyhedrons" track (same) from Disco Elysium OST, or theme 2 (same) from Ascendancy OST,
For a company building bloody airplanes - yes, I totally agree.
I'd expect it to be about the same, with 737 MAX, yes, on one side and too many examples on the other.
"Would" happen? That's literally what initially happened. They just hoped for something impossible.
From what I can tell, the rebuilders are not adding any kind of value to the situation.
They are adding popularity. Enterprise is slow to change in some ways, but I can totally see the trend of moving to Debian. RH seems to have forgotten their own history and how they've started with one Red Hat Linux, with paid support for those who wanted it, and that's what gave them the popularity to be profitable.
They don’t seem to want to artificially increase the difficulty of rebuilding RHEL sources, just to stop actively spending money making it easier when that work doesn’t return any money for the effort. Which is… Totally fair.
They are, in fact, going to reduce their revenue. Which is the main criterion for a business, no?
I mean, just like humans wither and die with time, so do companies.
Nobody and nothing living forever is one of the reasons centralization is bad. But humans sadly like to flock.
RH is approaching the end of its life cycle. First they were hackers. Then they became a useful and aspiring business. Then RPM-based distributions were what made Linux not marginal anymore (though probably this also has something to do with Mandrake's success). Then they became something in the center of things, connected to everything happening with Linux and other Unix-like systems (at least on desktop). Then they realized that and started milking that slowly. Then they became arrogant.
The GPL gives you that right, but RH still has the right to cancel your subscription (under this agreement) and not give you anything further under GPL conditions.
So technically (legally) it's fine and they are in their right, but RH has been doing lots of stuff recently (and not so recently) which I feel is combative and divisive, at the same time presenting their opposition as combative and divisive (the way they've been promoting Gnome 3 and Wayland and PA and SystemD and so on, trying to present everybody who doesn't like these things as a flat-eather or a conservative, and discarding any critique in a tone one shouldn't allow), using classic propaganda means at that. So they are not acting in good faith, and any reliance on them is bad.
No, it's a different OS not intended as an alternative to Windows in any other sense that it's a desktop OS too.
But it won't be hard if you start with something common, like openSUSE or Debian.
You mean that RH hates ergonomics? Agreed here.
About the function of systemd (or docker, or pulseaudio, or gnome 3, or wayland) - well, I don't need it, but I understand the usual arguments of its proponents. It does solve problems other init systems don't. Only it's such a PITA to use that I'm a Void Linux user.
Especially sad considering that this was entirely different in the Gnome 2 times.
RH is the maintainer\developer of great many things. Of course it'd be nice for them to have good competition (like what Canonical was), so that they wouldn't use that power for evil.
Still them becoming weaker is not a case for optimism.
I'd really like something like Gentoo with official binary packages (and relevant tree), so that building from source would be an option and installing a binary package the usual way. Well, also simpler installation maybe.
I mean, Calculate Linux does that, but I think it's a Russian small-business oriented distribution, so not exactly my use case.
Maybe systemd gets grouped with wayland and xorg with other init systems simply because of usability?
I mean, I got used to the thought that what I prefer is less usable, because some pretentious UX designers say so, and we Unix nerds use inconvenient things because we are all perverts.
But when I read about industrial design and ergonomics, it seems that my preferences are consistent with what I read, and all those UX designers and managers should just be fired for incompetence and malice.
Back to wayland/xorg and runit/systemd (for example), same reason FreeBSD may seem easier to set up and use than an "advanced" Linux distribution - there's less confusion.