The benefit of the doubt logic here Is as follows:
Mozilla thinks that the ad supported model of the web is essential to continuing to function.
Mozilla knows that the vast majority of installs have an adblocker installed.
In order to keep the ecosystem healthy they’re exploring ethical advertising options.
Counterpoint:
The vast majority of their income comes from the largest advertising company in the world - alphabet.
They need to be seen to at least make some efforts to not murder the advertising model through their mere existence while not pissing off the community too much.
See how much an exploit for iPhone vs Android will run you in the open market.
Also how fast a discovered security hole will be patched and distributed to the fleet between the two systems.
Most Android phones will never get a patch, some will get it 6 - 12 months later and very few within the month.
Also one is run by an advertising company.
Black Panther.
It had so much hype in the media, i was so excited to watch it. It turned out to be rather boring and forgettable.
How will the far right help with any of that? They’re not known for running public utilities.
One would think that if that’s your problem you’d vote further left - renationalise public utilities etc.
You should have seen Japan..
I hate that the headline is putting it as a foregone conclusion.
Instead of something along the lines of: Will the government allow this massive theft of intellectual property of average Australians?
You can see how this structure favours the most sociopathic members of society, as they are the ones that will take more risks without regard for others.
I'll believe AI can replace engineers when I see NVIDIA firing them. But like the graphic says, the manager's job seems a lot easier to replace instead.
I don't think there was a time when formatting wasn't important.
From double spaced text to allow edits, to certain margins, to sectioning, to indexes, to appendices, to properly italicized bibliographical references, to page references etc.
It assists you in conveying your intent as the writer and if standardized it makes it easier for the reader (ie your teacher) to orient themselves with minimal effort. Similar to having a consistent user interface.
Exactly. The calculus for taking risks is vastly different when there's a safety net. You can treat it as a game and go all in.
On the other hand if there's even a small chance of losing housing or getting in legal trouble or your family being destitute you take no risks - if you are a person with a sense of responsibility that is.
He had knowledge and connections to the upper echelons and he couldn't make it, and when health concerns arose he went back to his money because it sucks to be working poor and in need of medical assistance.
More than that, most peanut butter has a lot of hydrogenated vegetable fats which are likely much worse than a bit of sugar.
If the package doesn't have a tablespoon of peanut oil or so pooling at the top when you first open it, that you then need to mix it in, it's hydrogenated.
Wage slavery? No. It's poly-employment.
How do you study mind-altering drugs when every clinical-trial participant knows they’re tripping?
You give them other hallucinogenics than the one you're studying?
I wonder if it's later going to be found that these people are the useful idiots of big oil producers trying to undermine the cause on public opinion on purpose.
They don't know what you are talking about my fellow Aussie. Any A in an acronym means "American" to the USAns. That other countries exist that start with A is unfathomable.
