but to people with faith, their faith is evidence-based
yes but translation from evidence to what caused the evidence to exist requires assumptions, like the fact that trig works. I'm not saying assumptions are bad, just that they should be acknowledged
but maybe if you spent more time on it you would want to look at your face for longer and decorate it
they were complaining about things that are only unpleasant because of their own feelings toward the situation
can you elaborate? I'm not sure what your point is
yeah except that logic relies on base assumptions, which are ultimately chosen based on gut feelings
facts actually are very difficult to define. imagine telling an alien about the fact that people stop at stop signs, when the alien potentially has never seen a road, car, or stop sign
just because it has a reason doesn't make it not arbitrary. you can ultimately come up with a reason for all arbitrary decisions
my point was more broad. most products are design based on what the "market" wants, instead of what the individual making it wants. thus results in a diluted product that does too many things and all poorly
yeah but more often than not that full armor is fun! and if you're not impatient, then taking more time really isn't that big of a deal
and that's the secret to a good product
absolute scales are still arbitrary. you would probably want to use a scale that measures "perceived heat" which is different than average kinetic energy
good luck defining where facts end and beliefs begin. ultimately science is a belief, even if it is evidence-based
yes but in order to effectively use technology to replace memory you still have to commit things to memory. if I don't know something exists then how can I Google it?