I’ve also seen the image with the dog. It was on posted originally 4chan. And the dog was obviously fake there. Is it really so hard for you to believe that when burning down homes with families hiding in them, babies will also get burned to death?
You mean you trust a random 4chan post more than a news organization and the PM of Israel.
The user you replied to doesn’t treat it as a black or white issue, though. They just aren’t posting Hamas apologia like the rest of the commenters here.
Dude the link contains images. Are you going to tell me the images are fake? And propaganda is not necessarily false. It’s just meant to be convincing.
Distrusting a source is different to disputing evidence. do you dispute the evidence?
Which intelligence agency is that? Israel’s “Hasbara” (propaganda) minister just quit (was fired) because she was somehow even more incompetent than the rest of the government.
Hamas propaganda is even more impressive, apparently.
Gaza city is a city within the Gaza strip. Israel told them to evacuate south of wadi Gaza. It’s obviously impractical for all those people to evacuate in reasonable time but they do have where to go.
״hard not to be violent”? This was a premeditated massacre committed by trained and armed militants. It wasn’t a riot or an angry mob.
You know you can read about it yourself instead of asking strangely suggestive questions
You can’t unilaterally declare peace. That’s just an oxymoron.
so your job is to spread lies, propaganda and fake news, and support calls for genocide. Got it 👍
There are no evidence any civilians were raped or are enslaved. Stop spreading disinformation.
And I guess according to your logic, countless thousands more innocents should suffer or die because of the horrible actions of a few.
Fuck you, you piece of shit, the blood of thousands of innocent souls is on your useless fascistic hands. I hope you get what you deserve, you pathetic disgrace of a human. Signed, an Israeli citizen.
Nazi politicians produce nazi policies. Nazi scientists produce scientific research.
So I guess you agree that the profit motive isn’t necessary, because you moved to a completely unrelated point
- If X is a necessary motive for Y, then in the absence of X, Y cannot happen.
- Innovation can happen in the absence of a profit motive.
- Therefore, the profit motive is not necessary for innovation.
If the profit motive is not the only motive that drives innovation, as you just agreed, then it isn’t necessary, logically. And not sure why you would then go on to expand the definition of profit into meaninglessness after agreeing there are other motives.