I am not a court. I don't have to have a trial to believe in somebody's guilt. According to the evidence I have seen it appears he shot a man to death.
They are, by law, innocent until proven guilty. The “evidence” you have seen is certainly not all the evidence, and your beliefs have been swayed before defense can make an argument.
You don't know anything other than what lying American police told you and lying American media reported they said. You have absolutely no evidence or have any knowledge of his guilt or innocence. It appears that way to you because liars told you and now you are repeating it to me like an obedient dog.
It really seems like it's human nature to call out bullshit when you see it on your opposing side and then do mental gymnastics when it gets applied to you.
This literally makes no sense, you applied nothing to me. You've said nothing of substance. You are unable to say anything worth while because you are a moron. The only one full of shit is you who believes you have evidence of a murder that you don't and are sure people are guilty before any sort of due process. You're just another propagandized American idiot and there is no value to reading anything you ever have to say. You are completely worthless. Talk to my block list fash
I mean, the word criminal basically means law breaker.
Now as many laws are unjust and many horrific actions are protected by the law.
Just like at one point in time... a futitive slave, would be by definition a criminal, and his owner by definition not a criminal.
Again, the whole concept is noting that it's about the definition of the word criminal... and that criminal does not have to do with morality.... only in concurance with the laws of the land it is taking place in.
Commiting a crime makes you a criminal, so if you break a law you are a criminal. And if the decisions of health insurance workers are also breaking laws they are criminals too.
Then if you have ever gone faster than the speed limit, you are a criminal. That makes most people in the developed world criminals.
That aside, the point is that naming someone a criminal has moralistic baggage, and by saying that anyone that breaks laws is a criminal thus immoral, you imply all laws are inherently moral.