"Um Actually, ☝️🤓, I've done the math and the PSL is fucked" and other bad takes.
"Um Actually, ☝️🤓, I've done the math and the PSL is fucked" and other bad takes.
"Um Actually, ☝️🤓, I've done the math and the PSL is fucked" and other bad takes.
The knee jerk reaction to immediately attack people for questioning it is incredibly revealing
Revealing of what?
the nature of the uncritical supporters of PSL.
I'll be clear, I am still a critical supporter of PSL, and obviously I have made my critiques known in this thread. I have seen PSL stans attack people all across left internet spaces for voicing criticism, and I've seen PSL leadership silence members for voicing criticism. There is a culture that rejects criticism in PSL, and it is anti-Marxist.
As a personal anecdote, when I visited their main chapter branch library, in the essential reading section was Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky. Stalin wasn't anywhere to be found. This was like 12 years ago. I immediately had suspicion of them from that point on, and it was before I knew anything about their history as descendants of US trots. It was before I knew over three dozen people who left the org from chapters across the country because of their covering up and protecting of SAers and transphobes who were "doing a lot of important work." I know people from multiple different chapters who had this happen in their local chapters, several of which are the trans women who were the targets of the transphobia. Even without these anecdotes and good personal reasons to have doubt in PSL, I am still critically supportive, but trying to silence a conversation about the criticisms or disregarding it without reason seems like a problem.
Stalin wasn't anywhere to be found.
We read a lot of Stalin. Foundations of Leninism is a standard text in onboarding and candidacy.
And to another comment you made in this thread about "paper members": PSL does not have paper members. Joining is an intensive process, with a year of political education and organizing training before one becomes a full member and need to pay dues. If you aren't engaged, we ask you to either recommit or leave the party.
I know you aren't just bashing PSL senselessly, but I think a lot of what you're saying is very off-base regarding party strategy and tactics. If I had more time and wasn't on my phone, I'd try to explain a lot more of my specific disagreements. I think you characterization of the composition of membership and the investment of organizing hours are both completely off. On the second half of that, I'd guess no more than 25% of my branch's organizing time was spent on the campaign this year. It was an intensive month in the spring and a few months (less intensive) in the fall. In both of those periods we engaged in all of the other normal work we do, and most of the campaign work just tied into at as a rhetorical boost.
Yeah if you have the time please do explain the disagreements and talk about what the other 75% of work your chapter is doing looks like, I'd love to know
the other 75% of work your chapter is doing looks like
If I were to break 2024 down into a few categories and highlights:
There's plenty more small stuff but that's a good overview.
I appreciate you taking the time to write this up, it seems like your chapter is doing a lot of promising work and I hope to see others around the country doing the same. If the chapter in my area was doing even half of these things I would be impressed, they are one of the larger chapters and don't seem to have the same drive.
I'm happy they were on my ballot, but it shouldn't be verboten to question how useful the campaign is.
In the three days after the election, the party received as many applications to join as it had members. That was the point, and at that it was incredibly successful.
Lots of group onboarding processes that can bring together a large group of prospects and involve them in educational and organization opportunities for a few months while we formally onboard in small batches. It winnows out folks who aren't very serious and giving the ones who are much firmer footing when they get brought in.
We changed nothing, other then the usual refining of tactics. It is the direct effect of the campaign as a method for raising awareness and engaging new members.
Many branches refined their application process as a result of this, and the entire system for applications to join online was revamped. Party members were very clear that this can't be an opportunity that slips through the PSL's hands and in my experience we were far better about engaging on this than in the past.
They probably would've done more good if they just used that money to feed homeless people or donate that money to Palestinian orgs.
More direct good, maybe, but growing the party now allows them to accomplish more in the future.