If "Master/Slave" terminology in computing sounds bad now, why not change it to "Dom/Sub"?
If "Master/Slave" terminology in computing sounds bad now, why not change it to "Dom/Sub"?
It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology's problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.
You're viewing a single thread.
View all comments
436
comments
We agreed on Primary/Secondary and Primary/Replica already. Sorry.
12 0 ReplyDoes IEEE have a term for switch or am i about to get intimate with five ethernet cables?
4 0 Reply
You've viewed 436 comments.
Scroll to top