You're viewing part of a thread.
You have changed the argument from: demand decreasing does not reduce supply. To: we can't reduce demand. Do you see the flaws in your argument yet?
2 0 Replyyou haven't provided a method to test your hypothesis.
1 0 Replydemand decreasing doesn't cause a reduced supply.
1 0 ReplyEvidence? Assertion without requires no evidence to refute.
I'm not going to believe that commies are inherently dumb no matter how hard you try.
1 0 Replyone easy way to gauge demand would be price.
the price of Faberge eggs varies, but even when it increases, indicating an increase in demand, no more are produced. and by contrast upon a price decrease, no causal mechanism reduces the supply. qed.
2 1 ReplySo, where are the warehouses full of unsold eggs that are constantly filling up waiting for your point to land?
1 0 ReplyI just showed that supply is not dependent on demand.
1 0 ReplyYou did not. But thanks for playing.
1 0 Replyyou may not be qualified to understand this, or perhaps you lack reading comprehension, or are simply refusing to concede a clear point of fact for some reason, but I most certainly did.
1 0 ReplyYou did not. And you are bad at this. À tout à l'heure.
1 0 Replyanyone can read what was said. denying it is silly.
1 0 ReplyLol. What you said was pants on head level ridiculous. But I'm glad you're proud of it.
1 0 Reply
I'm not constructing an argument
I'm deconstructing one.
1 3 ReplyYou think you are, but this is not new territory and you are not that interesting.
1 0 ReplyI anyone can see exactly what happened in this thread, and if you're disinterested, you needn't reply.
1 1 Reply