unsafeCode
unsafeCode
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/e4ec26aa-d8dc-42bb-8598-4049ee0b9639.webp?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/e4ec26aa-d8dc-42bb-8598-4049ee0b9639.webp?format=webp)
unsafeCode
You're viewing a single thread.
Should return 0;.
What is C++? A miserable huge pile of "should"s
Love me some Castlevania++
should have a space after „>” and two new lines after „?”.
I guess markdown is miserable as well.
not being able to master markdown might hint at why the commenter is struggling with C++
Hey now, markdown serves it's purpose. It's not great, but as a web dev, I don't want people expecting full WYSIWYG editors in every website cause fuck that!
Still love it tho. You can make it whatever you want!
Not needed, main in C++ implicitly returns 0 if there is no return
Should ≠ Needs to
You can do it, and it will work, but it's unclean and not best-practice. I wouldn't be surprised if it's undefined behaviour.
Just to clarify. It is defined behavior - there's plenty of undefined behavior in C but that ain't one of them.
Interesting feature, I had no idea. I just verified this with gcc and indeed the return register is always set to 0 before returning unless otherwise specified.
It likely does, at some point within the ellipsis.