Skip Navigation

YouTube suspends monetisation of Russell Brand's channel

www.bbc.co.uk Russell Brand: YouTube suspends star's channels from making money from adverts

The comedian and actor is accused of historical rape and sexual assaults, which he denies.

Russell Brand: YouTube suspends star's channels from making money from adverts

Or in other words "Megacorp reminds you that it can and will decide to pocket cut your income based on the court of public opinion".

This is not a discussion about the allegations against him, this is about the fact that Google have decided to pocket the income they would otherwise be giving him (not taking down the videos, oh no, they're probably bringing in even more ad revenue now!) without any convictions or similar. Not that Google is an employer (I'm sure they consider payments they make to video uploaders to be some kind of generous untaxable gift), but should an employer have the power to take away a source of income based on allegations, no matter how heinous?

Edit: seems they're actually not putting ads on his videos at all now, which was a surprise to me

58

You're viewing a single thread.

58 comments
You've viewed 58 comments.