You're viewing a single thread.
As someone who grew up before computers and smartphones were commonplace, for the most part you could still life in the same way as you did before computers and smartphones, because all the things you'd need still exist. You'd just be horribly out of the loop of the way modern life functions.. But you could do it.
What's interesting is that pretty much no one wants to live this way any more. It was pretty damn boring a lot of the time.
Yeah but maybe a bit of our problem is people don't get bored anymore. The feeling of boredom is an important one and we stuff it down with dopamine doping and doom scrolling. When I was a child, if I got bored I went outside, or I saw if my friend could play, or I got a toy out. Once smart phones came along suddenly being bored was just an invitation for Reddit— Lemmy— to fill in the void.
I'm glad that Lemmy is not as addictive as Reddit was. I want to be bored a bit sometimes. Boredom makes me do chores instead of ignore them. Or play with my kid more. Or go hiking.
I don't imagine 80s kids would have said they had boring childhoods, just because they weren't completely soaked up with phones demanding their attention 24/7.
My childhood wasn't boring, but I was bored an awful lot. And I agree, boredom can be a great motivator. But I can't say that I miss being bored.
I think nobody would really say their childhood was boring. But if you were to take a kid from the 80s and a kid today and compare their daily lives, regardless of what interests they have, the 80s kid would find their own life pale in comparison. You've got video games, movies, social media, news, books, and music on the entertainment front. There's so many paths to express one's creativity, whether in art, music, engineering, film. And of course nothing is really stopping you from doing anything you could do 30 years ago and doing it today.
This. It destroys real life community and severs local bonds between people. It makes one ungrounded.
To take a step back and think of our parents letting us out of the house to roam where we did without having any way of getting into contact with us is absolutely bonkers to me as a parent now.
I'm having to work on a safety plan for a trade school. There is no good way of establishing communication across campus in the event of a disaster outside of A) Walkie Talkies or B) Cellphones. And honestly I can't entrust faculty and staff to grab a walkie talkie in such an event. What I can trust is that they'll have their cellphone on them.
To take a step back and think of our parents letting us out of the house to roam where we did without having any way of getting into contact with us is absolutely bonkers to me as a parent now.
You've bought into paranoia. In the US, most areas are far safer than they were in previous generations. Crime rates are largely down from their highs in the 70's and 80's. And even the 90's wasn't a safe time, by comparison. Even in the 90's, the whole "stranger danger" crap was so overblown that it probably did far more harm than good. The problem today is that news, both traditional and online are a 24x7 feed of "doom, DOOM, DOOOOOOOOOOOOM!" which give a horribly skewed perspective on how bad things really are. For my own kids, they disappear with the neighbors' kids for hours at a time, and we'll call them in when it gets dark. This usually involves either yelling from the front porch (I really wish I could whistle like my mother did. I could hear that whistle a mile off); or, calling around to the various houses until we find them. They don't have cell phones yet, and probably won't for a few more years, as they just don't need them. Also, I don't want to worry about an expensive electronic device ending up left somewhere or smashed.
Oh no, I agree with you entirely. That's my point, I know it's safer than ever and yet I still want that connection. You can call that paranoia, I call it an overabundance of caution for the soul that means most to me. How my parents did it without that connection during a time that wasn't safe by comparison is amazing to me.
I'm not worried about my child's safety in terms of other people. I'm worried because I know all the dumb, outright dangerous shit I did as a child and that they are as predisposed as I am.
I'm trying to not spend too much of my time online and I'm going kinda successful on that. But I can't say the same about living without smartphone. I need it to study through PDFs and reading EPUB books. I'm 31 years old, so I picked a tiny part of the "pre terminally online era" during my childhood. However, I've became a sort of internet addict in my teens. I should be avoided it, but it's a bit to late. Can't fix the past, but I can fix my future.
A bit of things are harder to do now, without smartphone or especially without computers. I have no idea how this is going in the US, but here (France) there's been a big push for "all online" stuff, including mandatory administrative tasks. Less digital alternative are still mostly available, but the trend of being able to handle thing without computers is clearly dying. And yes, this means an increasing number of people is lost and can't do stuff we expect them to do; it seems not enough people care.
And, even outside of that, having a bank account these days can require having a smartphone, more specifically an iOS or Android; the "bank app" being used as an authenticator and required for anything from logging-in on their website to performing money transfers.
We still can operate offline, mostly, but there's a huge push toward changing that. And I'm not sure there's a way to make that without leaving a lot of people behind.
Yes we are probably at the tail end of the time where you can still pay with cash, go to the bank branch, handle things at government offices, etc.
I strongly believe we will evolve around the technology we created.
What made sapiens evolution unique was our ability to communicate. We are exponentially increasing that ability.