On a related note, it’s amusing how there’s a bit of a civil war they’re having over blaming Brandon for enabling Israel’s genocide, and blaming him for “funding” Hamas and not helping them enough. Going by the comments.
I believe it's all the same article with the title changing as the US State Department narrative rolled out, but who knows what the chuds are on about.
As someone who actually reads the NYTimes, this isn't really a traditional article publication format. The format of the website shows a headline for latest info for a news event and then you click on it and there is a live feed of info coming in the form of summaries and some quick posts from reporters as the situation develops along with the time of when the particular block of info was posted.
If people are complaining because they think they just write a single article, hit publish, and then only edit the headline as they feel like it, they're not familiar with how news is communicated now and likely don't read the news, just headlines, screenshots, and posts on social media.
They made a statement and then continued to make it more accurate as additional facts and information became known. Everyone on the right knows you make up your mind once, then stick your fingers in your ears and yell “la la la la I can’t hear you” to keep out any information that would change your original opinion.
Except the facts didn't change, the IOF just refused to claim responsibility, and are now scrambling to assign blame elsewhere in order to create FUD, which is pretty typical wartime propoganda, especially if they are planning to mount a ground offensive soon. We all fight over who bombed the hospital while ignoring the ground offensive that is imminent.
Regardless, this is just one incredibly egregious war crime in a sea of war crimes this week by the IOF, so it's very funny to watch the hullabaloo around them attempting to pin this on the IJF. Ultimately, the original claim of the NYT headlines is still completely accurate, but the idea that headlines are altered to obfuscate the truth is somehow 'leftist' or 'communist' is typical reactionary boomer brain in action, which hasn't read a real book since high school forty years ago.
lmao when you're so high on you don't recognize passive voice in headlines when the edits are right in front of you defend increasingly passive voice headlines that exhonerate the oppressor as being "more accurate"
this has been critiqued for years, I'd thought libs like you died out entirely after 2020
you have until this countdown ends to do some self-crit and delete your comment