There's a difference between politics and hate speech I'd say. Politics sure ok. Ad hominem attacks and hate speech should be removed imo. Additionally, if a thread is becoming too hostile, sometimes locking it down is just a good thing to do before things get worse.
Totally agree. The thing is it's a thin line between identifying hate speech and disagreement. Some people (mods) confuse the two. Moderating well is a tough job.
I don't think people even understand what an ad hominem attack is anymore. There was a time people understood the distinction between making a cutting remark about someone else's thinking, but this was at a time when people fundamentally recognized that thoughts are not us. As it is, it's become far more common for people to mistakenly assume that hurt feelings are the result of given offense, and not taken offense. Reddit mods didn't know the difference, and already I am getting that people in this thread don't seem to get that difference either.
Nah. Us vs Them thinking is usually the number one indicator of brainwashing. Villifying in order to present yourself as someone who 'understands' is another. Very GenZ of you.
The problem is, people use the blurry lines of "hate speech" to encompass broadly any speech that disagrees with their position. E.g., Gender Ideology. It has become fashionably virtuous for people to hide behind claims of hate speech in order to silence dissent and erroneously shame their opposition.
Well the good thing about lemmy is that people can jump ship and form new communities if they don't like the moderation of one. It will almost certainly lead people into echo chambers even more insulated than on reddit, though.
Dumb. Lies should be deleted not debated. It takes too much energy to refute lies. That's why fascists lie all the time. People acting in bad faith, deliberately lying, should not have a platform in a democracy.
Easy for me but then I went to school for many many years.
I don't know, once every court to hear Trump's bogus election challenges threw them out for lack of evidence, seems pretty easy to know the election denialists were proven liars. Ban them all at that point.
Let science, peer review, and the law decide, case by case.
It doesn't appear you understand the words you're using, or have a clear sense of reason in your arguments. Lots of hot button words with very GenZ takes.
Who brags about having degrees from indoctrination mills? Says nothing about your degree of intellect. Three degrees later and you still haven't figured that part out. 👏 👏 👏