Big Galaxy S24 leak reveals Samsung's strategy against Google's Pixel phone
Big Galaxy S24 leak reveals Samsung's strategy against Google's Pixel phone
Samsung might copy Google's trick: seven years of updates for the Galaxy S24.
Quoting the tl;dr in the linked article:
Samsung could be stepping up its game by offering seven years of major Android updates for the Galaxy S24 series, and the generous update policy might extend to other Galaxy flagships.
The Galaxy S24 series might also introduce charges for AI features like Live Translate and Pixel-like photo editing tools after 2025.
There's speculation that users may need to sign in to their Samsung accounts for certain AI functionalities.
You're viewing a single thread.
Permanently Deleted
Wouldn't a power bank solve that issue? So far the airports I've been to usually have the power sockets completely hogged so I don't even count on the chance that one is free. I usually bring along a power bank that gets me through 2-3 full charges of my phone.
really I've rarely seen airports that full even LAX but I also don't travel during the busy times of the year
Or. https://www.ossia.com/cota
This is the future.
You don't need 100% battery. You need a battery that doesn't go flat.
Fast charging just buggers the battery. Too much heat isn't great
With a wireless product like that you're probably not even going to get enough power to charge your phone. Maybe sustain it.
Is there a timestamp ? I'm not watching a 1 hour vid.
Watt up and ossia have been around for a few years. Both have products on the ground. I have full faith in them. I understand that physics has a theoretically limit for power. More power requires more energy. Too much energy and you'll burn a face off.
Yet these companies exist and have backers in the billions. Either they have a working system or they are great conmen.
Considering that we just saw hyperloop die with over 500 million invested... conmen it's more likely than you think. The fact that people like you believe that physics even allows this to work is literally what allows them to continue the con. Qi charging barely works... inverse square law proves that we cannot do more than a few inches for anything that will be sufficient for a phone and the waste power to do it will be ginormous.
https://www.ossia.com/blog/cota-forever-magnetic-charger-wins-ces-innovation-award
It did win ces awards. Now that may be a good or a bad thing. But it's not vaporware.
They have products out that work.
Okay... Where can I buy this product?
Notice that the company was started in 2013... And those "products" they have are literally impossible to purchase (I actually even signed up for "contact me!" to purchase one I'll let you know if I get any information back... I'm willing to bet no.). This is sign 1 that this is bullshit. Notice that different materials show wildly different designs for products, none of which matches up to the actual product page. If something actually existed, it would look the same everytime we observed it... because you know... it's real. Notice there's no videos of the product actually working, just a produced video claiming it's a live functions test... Except it's a produced video. https://youtube.com/watch?v=HEfPgx51cas . The video claims that you can selectively stop charging things... That's not how wireless antennas work at all. You can beamform to some extent, but if a device is near to another device that has an active beamformed lobe, you're going to end up charging both(so they lied in the video). The video also uses a fuckton of terms RF terms really poorly. And they themselves admit it's 1W of power. The shittiest of usb chargers charge at 12W (5v x 2.4amp). You will charge 1/12th the slowest charger, and isn't actually even enough to trigger the "charging" notification in your notification bar. Further notice that the UI shows "zigbee ID" information. Zigbee is an already existing wireless mesh communications platform, typically used for IoT devices. The BEST zigbee controller chips already use 1/10th of your power budget. One of the major usages of Zigbee is controller lights and stuff... It's much more likely that they built a "charging case" that is just an LED and battery that they can flip the light on and off to make this BS video.
It is vaporware when we're talking about purchasable products... and you can't/never could purchase it.
There's been dozens of company's claiming that this can be done. They've all failed. None of them have brought a viable product to market. Exactly the same story as hyperloop, where every company lied and failed to produce.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=lDdRVtka0Jg Other companies have even published ACTUAL attempts at "real world demonstrations". Which have been proven to be bullshit. (starts at 17:40) I'm sure youtube will link you to the other dozens of these products that EEVBlog themselves have debunked by walking through the materials and calculations. If you can point to even ONE Thing that OSSIA is doing different than the other 10 companies doing the same damn thing (poorly) then I'll eat every fucking work I've written. But it's all bullshit, putting 500W into a sending unit and only 1W comes out the other end, and often times barely.
Now the best part! The FCC limits transmission power anyway! You want to charge 10 cellphones at their rated 12W slow charge? You actually CANNOT. FCC doesn't allow an antenna in any form to push that much power without licensing. And I mean amateur radio type licensing. Snippet stolen from someone else that I copied a long while ago:
Go look at the FCC rules for a 500W 15MHz transmitter and safe operating distance from the antenna ..... According to the FCC an amateur 20M station (14 MHz) operating at 500W you need to be 3.4 meters away from the antenna at a minimum ..... Which means you cannot have the antenna anywhere in the average sized room without subjecting humans and pets to dangerous levels of RF power. This also assumes a 0 db gain antenna (omni-directional). If you are using a gain antenna such as forming it into a beam or making it directional the the safe distance increases to 4.8M for a 3 db gain, 6.8M for a 6 db gain, etc.
There is no way you are going to develop 500W of power at 15 MHz and get it past the FCC .... If you drop it to 100W you'd still need a 1.5M safe operating distance so you'd be lucky to get 5W at 15 MHz approved for something sitting under your desk .... And that doesn't even take into account RFI problems if you don't have a clean Sine wave and are radiating harmonics and perhaps jamming your neighbor's garage door opener ......
So if you can't even be near the transmitter for fear of actual danger to the subjects... How the fuck are you going to charge things that are in range if you're not even allowed to be in range?
Gosh and golly, a CES award! Man! Thats just so impressive! Jeeze if they're doing that well, they must have a really good product! Maybe next year they'll have refined it so much they win a red dot design award, that would surely be their Fifty-To-One moment! Or maybe even, dare to dream, a JD Power award! Talk about underdog victories!
I know. Ces award. It actually got 7. I don't know what that says.
In any case. It has products and is bringing another to market. Will it work ? Your guess is as good as mine. Companies have partnered so they obviously think it's worth while. If the product is a flop then can say for sure.
(I haven't slept in entirely too long so my apologies if my prose is somewhat lacking here)
CES awards really are deserving of my initial sarcasm. Most of these awards are. You usually can't literally just buy them, but the process is pretty much no different. There's no evaluation of quality, effectiveness, or even basic things like "does it meet the claims made on the box" made before they're given out. And I hate to pull the 'godwin's law' of investor cautionary tales, but take Theranos. How many awards did it win? I don't know, because I got bored counting after thirty, but they clearly didn't mean much. And I'll grant you, it's not the perfect example I'd like it to be, because Theranos' claims were based on medical biology and that's a bit out of scope for what would be reasonable of CES judges in a perfect world and Ossia is first-year physics or the HAM extra exam.
What my point here is, is that we already have this technology, and it's used every day. But the applications here are incredibly specific: inventory control, both realtime monitoring and loss prevention (RFID tattletail stickers are on everything nowadays) and similar applications, where it powers essentially an RFID tag that consumes power in the microwatts. There are systems that can transmit Watts of end-point power, but those systems are close range (3'-4') and very dangerous for humans to work around. It's radiation, man!
Look, it's just physically not possible for them to be transmitting the power to run (examples taken from their website) [a television, your Phone, a tablet] over any great distance (more than 3"-4"), and have that device be safe for people to be around. Yes, microwave power transmission is possible, famously you can heat your coffee on a field broadcast transmitter, but it's not possible to provide an end result of ~5W of power across your living room without incidentally giving you some novel form of skin cancer. Even their directed antenna tech just... can't change the laws of physics like this.
Valid. But there are products out there.
People like me believe. Ho there. Back your arse right up.
I follow along with what I am told. If someone says they can do it. Show that it can be accomplished. You pop up and say actually it can't and here's why.
Believing either of you is a toss up. Both come to the table with evidence.
At the end of the day the product will either work or it won't. Man went to the moon. 100 years ago they'd say can't be done. 200 before that and the ability to stream video over the internet would get you burnt for being a witch.
I'm sure science had fundamental laws but things change. Those laws aren't concrete. They are shown to exist but that doesn't mean things can't alter or impact those.
I can choose to believe.
I have invested in wattup. I think it's possible. Disney showed that it was possible. Just that an entire room was electrified and that you'd die of you went inside. We can mess with it.
I follow along with what I am told. If someone says they can do it. Show that it can be accomplished.
Except they haven't shown anything. There's literally nothing on the market that works. Literally nothing. Over a decade of this "Technology" being developed and there's nothing to show for it.
Believing either of you is a toss up. Both come to the table with evidence.
What? What evidence have they shown? The only video that I can find from any of these companies "working" is them lying to you and using like 20 modules to come up with the 5v of power then need to trick a phone into thinking it's charging by pulsing a capacitor.
At the end of the day the product will either work or it wonât. Man went to the moon. 100 years ago theyâd say canât be done. 200 before that and the ability to stream video over the internet would get you burnt for being a witch.
The difference is that nobody said that rules of physics and science outright disagrees. You cannot beat the inverse square law. This is much like the laws of thermodynamics. You don't just "change" them. The fact that people like you seem to thinks that laws of physics change is actually disturbing.
Iâm sure science had fundamental laws but things change. Those laws arenât concrete.
Uh what? Yes they are. You think that gravity just changes on a whim? That we discover some stuff and magically gravity will turn left? This is absurd.
I can choose to believe.
That's true. But that doesn't make it any more possible to actually do.
I have invested in wattup. I think itâs possible. Disney showed that it was possible. Just that an entire room was electrified and that youâd die of you went inside. We can mess with it.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4031486-energous-admits-wattup-unsafe-for-humans-and-cannot-get-fcc-approval This was published 7 years ago... They admitted it themselves... but you still "believe". Right? I hope you didn't invest much. That money has basically been lit on fire.
I have invested in wattup
Well that just about cinches it.
Well it means I put money down on an investment.
I'm sure you told the same thing to Tesla investors.
Can't be accomplished.
Time will tell
Tesla, the famed genius who 100 years ago was scamming rubes with the same impossble promises wattup is peddling? Kinda seems like time has told on that one.
Listen, Wattup isn't doing anything new. RF to DC has been around since... well, Tesla. We already use it in the insanely few applications where it's viable tech. You might even have a few RF to DC devices bolted to your house, solar panels. The problem is that Wattup doesnt have a literal star powering their chips. What was the last device you saw that was fully solar powered (calculator) - how much of the surface area was given over to that component? And how big are wattup's chips? yeah.
The power transfer Wattup promises is admittedly an impressive improvement in power while still staying within FCC guidelines, but go up one class of transmitter and you're back to playing with tech thats been around for a hundred years. We already use COTS parts for this for indoor mapping, thats what RFID inventory tags are. Or power over NFC devices. It's useful tech, but wattup hasn't shown ANY devices that actually hit their pie-in-the-sky performance goals ("recon drones"). One hour with a radio physics textbook and you too can do the math to understand why its never, ever going to happen. it's not a problem that can be innovated around, it's fundemental universal laws here.
Listen, Wattup isnât doing anything new.
And admit themselves that they cannot do what they claim to do safely. Including things like form factor...
You come across as condescending and rude, and I hope you reflect onto he way you interact with people.
Huh, neat. Sincerely, what part of that seems undeserved? Here, I'll explain my perspective:
The parent comment that really caught my attention includes such wisdom as:
I follow along with what I am told. If someone says they can do it. Show that it can be accomplished. You pop up and say actually it canât and hereâs why. Believing either of you is a toss up. Both come to the table with evidence.
Which really just speaks for itself there. It's "both sides" but with easily disproved corporate claims, being advocated for as totally reasonable and "I choose to believe". It's like tech bro fundamentalism, but... lame (edit: lamer). Also, while calling me "not a tesla investor advocate" barely warrants being called an ad hominem attack, like... come on. I'm not above rising to personal attacks, especially when I can quite clearly lay out why they're an ignorant schlub. (also also, it's hilariously wrong. Tesla was a very good investment and anyone could see that, including me, who owned Tesla stock. It's er... slightly less so as time has progressed, but tenish years ago? yeah, jumped on that band wagon, worked out for me... Also, that's just... the dumbest insult. Like come on.)
I think you're so caught up in your own self-righteous drive for civil internet discourse you've forgotten that
1: Other people online are perfectly aware of the tone they communicate through their comments, and chose that tone deliberately.
2: Sometimes, being rude and/or condescending is totally reasonable.
Like for example here, where someone is seemingly advocating for people to invest in a company (or justifying their own stupid, stupid choice) that is at very best grossly misrepresenting the product, and at worst just doing straight up investor fraud. Also, a company where their product claims are fundamentally impossible, and I can back that up with math. I might have been raised in some wildly different culture than you, with wildly different values, but I will say that I suspect your culture and mine both put a high social value on calling out rampant BS when it runs the risk of affecting other people in your community. This? This worthy of being scorned.
Seriously, maybe consider getting a better grip on that high horse before it runs off and does something interesting with it's life.
You don't need to charge it though.
Don't even need to sustain it. Just slow it's discharge. I don't need 100% phone.
I barely go out. Either at the office or at home.
Once we get solid state batteries in phones. A slow charge overnight and and slowing charge during the day. That's all I need. Probably a lot of people.
People who are flying and all over the place. They have something for they. Battery packs. They don't need kits all over the place. Can charge on plane. Can charge in Uber. Can charge on bus. In pubs/cafes.
My pixel has a slow charge feature I think. It uses that by default at night usually. Pretty nifty I guess.
Permanently Deleted
I have the same. Every phone should. It's just thrashing the battery and you don't need full charge an hour after going to bed. It's got hopefully 8 hours to charge.
You may want to watch the video. Specifically the 2.5mW segment.
I remember having this idea in 2016, but being a massive fucking idiot, never even remotely knew how to make it an actual thing. Good to see there's a market for it and that someone is executing on the tech.