Chad, a country in north-central Africa, borders a lot of active geopolitical areas - Niger to the West, Libya to the North, Sudan to the East - but is scarcely discussed itself. I'm not really knowledgable enough to give anything like a decent history, but the recent gist is that the country was ruled for three decades by Idriss Déby until he was killed in battle in 2021 while fighting northern rebels. Idriss was part of a few wars - such as the one against Gaddafi in Libya, and also the Second Congo War. While he was initially elected democratically in 1996 and 2001, he then eliminated term limits and just kept on going.
After his death, Chad has been ruled by his son, Mahamat Idriss Déby. In early May 2024, elections began which were meant to result in the transition from a military-ruled goverment to a civilian-ruled one. Needless to say, Mahamat won the election - with 61% of the vote. Both father and son have been on the side of the French and the US, whereas the opposition is against foreign colonizers and has attempted to put pressure on the government in numerous ways to achieve a more substantial independence. France maintains a troop presence in Chad, and it's something of a stronghold for them - when French troops were forced out of Niger, they retreated to Chad. However, it's not clear even to the people inside Chad what precisely the French are doing there. I mean, we know what their presence is really for - imperialism and election rigging - but in an official sense, they don't seem to be doing much to help the country materially. What is clear is that they like to intervene on behalf of the ruling regime and against rebels a whole lot - the most interventions by France in any African country, in fact.
The United States, so keen on human rights and democracy in so many places around the world like Russia, Iran, and China, have - for some strange reason! - decided for the last 30 years that they can live with a couple dictators and wars in the case of Chad. In fact, various American state propaganda firms like the ISW and Washington Post have warned the current government about the Wagner Group interfering with the country and spreading anti-Western sentiments as in the rest of the Sahel.
Things are very tough for Chad. They are among the poorest countries in Africa and host about one million people fleeing from nearby conflicts, which is a pretty large number when Chad has a population of about 17 million.
With the French Empire fading, they are beginning to run out of places to retreat to in Africa. Macron, in January, said that his defense council had decided to reduce troop presence in Gabon, Senegal, and the Côte d'Ivoire, though has maintained troop levels in Chad and Djibouti. Meanwhile, on the other side of the planet from France, anti-empire sentiments are boiling to the surface in New Caledonia/Kanaky, which is unfortunate for the French military as they really need that island, both for the massive nickel reserves, but also as an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Pacific just in case a conflict with China pops off.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Chad! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
What I've seen from local liberal media about the most recent act of genocidal mass murder by Israel is that they try to frame it as a retaliations for Hamas rockets, that unfortunately accidentally killed civilians.
It does feel like the strikes being timed after major anti-Israel events (e.g. the ICC ruling, the ICJ ruling, etc) is meant to evoke an abuser-esque feeling of "Look at what you made me do."
But it feels like it goes even further than that; it feels like: "You ruling against us is the thing that killed those refugees. You killed those people, not us. If you hadn't ruled against us, those children would still be alive. Those deaths are on your head." It's a very psychopathic strategy, but I don't think it really works because Israel has repeatedly demonstrated that they're willing to do these kinds of bombings and massacres for basically no reason whatsoever, so it's not really scaring anybody out of acting against Israel, it just pisses people off even more and generates even more anti-Israel sentiment and even more Hamas fighters. Israel would have had to have shown literally a nanogram of restraint up to this point for the atrocity propaganda (in the literal sense of the words) to be effective as it would have been this terrifying, new development.
And of course, it's not a sustainable strategy anyway because killing civilians just generates more fighters with nothing left to lose. Studying how these kinds of wars reveals that mass civilian murders just doesn't function as a strategy even if you're completely heartless and willing to go there. There's a reason why almost every country which the Europeans previously used these strategies on (concentration camps, cutting off limbs for slight infractions, etc) is now independent and aren't still enslaved under their rule, and it's not because of the grand gestures and speeches of Woodrow fucking Wilson.
I just saw a brand now tactic of them trying to claim it wasn't an Israeli strike at all, but hidden Hamas munitions just accidentally going off in the tents.
Makes perfect sense... hide munitions above ground, in plain sight of drones and satellites when you've got perfectly good tunnels underground to hid things in.
Its like when that ambulance got blasted by the Israelis and the excuse was something like, "Two Hamas terrorists were driving around in an ambulance instead of walking around safely in their tunnels."
Meanwhile, a German government spokesman said that Israel has a "right to defend itself within the framework of international law" and described Sunday's deadly strike as "presumably a mistake."
Referring to an ongoing Israeli investigation into the incident, he added: "In any case, a mistake has been made, that can already be said."
Asked about to whether Israel's actions in Gaza constitute war crimes, he said Berlin would reserve judgement until investigations are concluded.
"The conclusion as to whether this is a war crime in terms of international law is something that must be left to lawyers who know the exact facts," he said. "First, investigate what exactly happened and then make a judgement. [Let's] not make an immediate judgement based on pictures."
Officials from the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry have revised the death toll from Sunday night's Israeli airstrike on a Rafah refugee camp from 35 to at least 45 and said that over 200 more had been injured.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday said his government was investigating a deadly Israeli airstrike that killed scores of Palestinian civilians in a displacement camp in southern Gaza, calling it a "tragic incident."
"Israel has a right to go after Hamas, and we understand this strike killed two senior Hamas terrorists who are responsible for attacks against Israeli civilians," said a US National Security Council spokesperson, "But, as we've been clear, Israel must take every precaution possible to protect civilians."
Death toll in [Kharkiv] DIY store strike rises to 6, local officials say
Russian strikes on a crowded DIY hardware store in Kharkiv on Saturday killed at least six people and injured dozens, the region’s Governor Oleh Syniehubov said on national television.
Forty people were injured, with at least three in serious condition. Sixteen people were still unaccounted for, Syniehubov said.
Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov said about 120 people had been in the hardware store when the bombs struck.
"The attack targeted the shopping center, where there were many people — this is clearly terrorism," Terekhov said.
I might post some screenshots I took of a few different news sites when I get home. Pretty cursed collection though. It's not expansive, it was a few American sites + a couple of British ones, but it's still clear what they're trying to do.