iPhone 16 and 16 Pro review: A worthy upgrade after three years
iPhone 16 and 16 Pro review: A worthy upgrade after three years
arstechnica.com iPhone 16 and 16 Pro review: A worthy upgrade after three years
It's one of Apple's most iterative releases yet, but that's not a bad thing.
You're viewing a single thread.
View all comments
6
comments
The good
- These phones still have some of the best screens you can buy—even the non-Pro iPhone hits it out of the park
- They have by far the best smartphone performance, too
- Solid gains in GPU performance
- Camera Control brings the long-awaited physical shutter button
- The customizable Action button makes its way to the base iPhone
- New photographic styles allow you to move away from the pitfalls of Apple's computational photography decisions in any direction you choose
- High-end camera features previously reserved for more expensive models have trickled down
- Ultra-wide photos in low light got quite a bit better
- Battery life improvements are always welcome
The bad
- 60 Hz on the non-Pro phones is looking a bit long in the tooth
- Likewise, always-on displays are now standard in some of the iPhone 16's direct competitors
- The Pro phones don't offer enough to justify an upgrade over the base models for the majority of consumers
- Possibly the most subtle year-over-year upgrades in iPhone history—if that's really a bad thing
The ugly
- Not much, other than the steep prices
14 1 ReplyThe really bad: no side loading for non-EU, no Newpipe.
6 5 Reply3 1 Reply
You've viewed 6 comments.
Scroll to top