You're viewing part of a thread.
Counterpoint: https://youtu.be/R63DdEe_8aM
I love how that clip has multiple shots of trucks absolutely full of boxes, while making the case for a vehicle that could fit inside the truck as it's replacement.
I think you just missed the point entirely. You don't actually have to load up as many items in a cargo bike, because it's inherent advantages in urban contexts more than makes up for its inability to load up as many items.
What does that mean, exactly? What inherent advantages?
They are spelled out clearly in the video:
- Bicycle deliveries can utilize bicycle infrastructure and not get stuck in traffic
- Bicycle deliveries can at times navigate around traffic
- Bicycle deliveries have an easier time parking at the point of delivery
- Bicycle deliveries for obvious reasons require less fuel
- Bicycle deliveries require less capital cost, as their vehicles are cheaper than their counterparts
If I own a grocery, it's going to take a hell of a lot of bike trips to and from the warehouse to restock every day. Or I could employ an army of bikers. Or one truck.
Ok, so deliver food via truck. Choose the appropriate means of transportation for each type of last-mile delivery. The 200 gram Amazon package most certainly does not require a heavy truck to deliver.
How about over a thousand 200 gram packages all needing to go to separate places within a 5 mile radius? Are bikes still better for that?
One thousand stops within a five mile radius means that you're definitely going to make it out ahead with bike delivery. So yes, the bikes would very obviously come out ahead in this scenario.
It seems I missed the point. I had deliveries in mind where the truck is mostly empty most of the time. Restocking with a truck or cargo tram (depending on the environment) would make more sense.