You're viewing a single thread.
I'm gonna be that guy... but former English teacher here - By definition, factoids are inaccurate :) inaccuracies repeated so often that people 'go with it', that's when they become factoids.
'inaccurate factoid' is an example of a tautology. Like naan bread, or armed gunman.
You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.
C'mon dude. As a history teacher, I can tell you that it is definitely possible to fire a gun without arms.
I'm not even a gun dude and I've heard of those guns that shoot if you look at em funny. Hi points? I don't remember.
Just FYI, factoid has been misused for long enough that it now has an official second, contradictory definition:
A briefly stated and usually trivial fact.
If you're a former English teacher you should be aware that language changes and while "factoid" was originally coined to mean a made up fact, the term is currently mostly used to refer to small inconsequential facts.
That's literally the most ironic thing I've read
A gunman doesn't cease to be a gunman if he's disarmed. Though he can't be a gunman if he wasn't armed in the first place.
Most people have at least one arm, so aren't all gunmen armed?
Wouldn't it be a pleonasm? Tautology is more about the logic realm, specifically about repeating an argument or a statement as it they were different. Here "inaccurate factoid" is merely inaccurate vocabulary.
It's more redundant than inaccurate.
Nice.