King Charles portrait turned into Wallace and Gromit character by animal activists
King Charles portrait turned into Wallace and Gromit character by animal activists
The act was done to draw the King's'attention to 'the horrific scenes on RSPCA Assured farms', an animal rights group said
You're viewing a single thread.
The painting is protected by glass, so no damage was done to the painting.
I read through way too many articles that failed to mention this important detail.
147 0 ReplyIt wouldn’t be a big loss. That painting is ugly as hell.
58 6 ReplyI think it's a terrific representation of the horrifically bloody history of the British Monarchy
76 0 ReplyYeah, I don't think it was meant to be pretty lol
15 0 ReplyYeah, I know the artist said some other bullshit to justify this choice, but to me it just looks like the blood their wealth was built on.
6 0 Reply
I like it
12 0 ReplyI like it because it's hella odd as shit. King, embrace the fuck-my-shit-up results of this glorious piece.
7 1 Reply
I can't stop thinking about how someone got paid to make this painting.
6 1 ReplyHe's pretty famous for making portraits. Here's his portrait of Idris Elba.
13 0 ReplySee, that isn’t ugly.
Which makes me think it was on purpose. Which makes me hate it a little less.
9 0 ReplyHe has a lot of upper class clients who he paints just as ... starkly as the king's portrait.
It is very much on purpose.
9 0 Reply
Now that is a gorgeous balance of color and brush strokes. So why did the artist choose that awful color theme for Charles?
1 4 Reply
Right? Spit right in the royal families face and they pay you for the privilege. Priceless and hilarious
5 0 Reply
Philistine
2 1 Reply
Same shit that happens with every climate protest. "Climate protestors deface painting" etc.
9 0 ReplyIt's much less engaging this way.
3 0 Reply