The Real Reason Republicans Are Attacking Kamala Harris as 'Childless'
The Real Reason Republicans Are Attacking Kamala Harris as 'Childless'
Republicans to control every aspect of women's lives and their bodies. That’s why Harris' life choices and political success infuriate them
Millennials rise up. Childless is a valid fucking choice.
Not that I disagree but Kamala married Doug in 2014 and has two step children, aged 29 and 25. Or 19 and 15 at the time of marriage.
She is certainly a mother if she wants that title.
Also, one typically does not have kids at age.... 49.
Apparently they call her "momala".
When this doesn't work, expect angry black female next.
The term is "Uppity"
Trump will definitely say the n word if he uses uppity.
you can absolutely feel that one waiting in the wings. wonder if they will combine it with evil-jailer / hippie-prosecutor for 2x the wall action.
There’s just so many well known hippie prosecutors
dude they really have nothing. this is so pathetic lol... you'd think they have something but all they've gone up with so far has been:
- is woman
- is not white
- laughs
- is stepmom
the one thing that might actually hurt her support is that she's a prosecutor but they can't use that because they're supposed to be the tough on crime crowd but also nominated a convicted felon so it's really dumb to bring up the fact that she's a prosecutor.
edit: new attack line just dropped; add it to the list:
- is against plastic straws
man, she's really done for now
so it’s really dumb
That part is not what's stopping them.
You're making the mistake of assuming they will act logically, instead of like a brainwashed death cult. If logic mattered they wouldn't be Republicans.
They want to overhaul the justice system and redefine right and wrong, so they could easily attack her while being on their same message.
They’re not morally satisfied with anyone who’s not a white father of at least 5 children from at least 3 mothers.
*underage mothers
George Washington was sterile and, of course, had no children.
But the sons of his opponents wished that he was their dad.
He'll save children, but not the British children.
Added context: https://youtu.be/sbRom1Rz8OA?si=x2kIUb6LsEi8I-Ac
Is she sterile?
If she is it's none of your, or anyone else's business
59 year old women typically don't have children so at this point, functionally.
The GOP wants to control every aspect of women's lives and their bodies. That’s why Harris' life choices and political success infuriate them
...
But, of course, whether or not Harris is a parent, or how she parents, is not the GOP’s real issue. The real issue is that the GOP wants to exert control over every aspect of women’s lives, beginning with their bodies. The Dobbs decision was the beginning, but it is far from where they hope to take us. The Project 2025 manifesto wants to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception. Vance, himself, has said he’s in favor of a national abortion ban. And there is an increasing push on the right to roll back no-fault divorce.
Harris represents an idea of womanhood that flies in the face of all this.
The real reason is that they are fascist and they want to do fascist things. And they can't do as many fascist things if Trump is not elected as president.
She's not a Targaryan. We don't give a fuck.
Moving heir talking points so fast was very... Very telling.
Bombing their set, furiously flipping through their recipe cards for a bit that works, but all they have is junk