‘Google Is a Monopolist,’ Judge Rules in Landmark Antitrust Case
‘Google Is a Monopolist,’ Judge Rules in Landmark Antitrust Case
The ruling on Google’s search dominance was the first antitrust decision of the modern internet era in a case against a technology giant.
I can't root my Android phone right now to install something like LineageOS, but yesterday, I sat down, installed ADB, and got rid of a mountain of unnecessary crap that comes packaged with Android and which is installed as a "system package" so you're not allowed to uninstall it normally (e.g. Gmail).
It's extremely easy.
Unlocking bootloader/flashing isn't so easy for most people. I root every device I get, but for normal users this process isn't easy. Also some manufacturers aren't so friendly towards people unlocking bootloaders. I remember Sony lowering camera quality when you unlocked/installed Cyanogenmod back in Z2 times, or more recently Asus preventing you from unlocking completely.
Add HMD Nokia to the blocking unlocks completely camp
Yeah, the bootloader really seems like a challenge. ADB fortunately is extremely easy, especially if you use a tool like
App Managerfrom F-Droid to correspond package names to specific applications.Just
adb shellwhen your phone is in developer mode and you hook up to your computer via USB, thenpm uninstall --user 0 packagename.
If I am looking it up correctly, judge Amit Mehta was appointed by Obama (who had ties with Google), and still ruled google a Monopoly.
I just like stuff like this as it shows a judge can put bias aside in a ruling at least once, supposedly.
Not really. It could be simply that in an effort to not appear biased he over corrected and ruled more harshly against Google.
Now I'm not saying that this is what happened here, but it's just another facet of why it's important to avoid bias entirely, not simply trust that someone can rise above them.
Lina Khan should be the next attorney general.
Nah, I think she's doing good work where she's at.