Putin has decided that Russia is going to be a 'safe haven' for people who want to trade liberal Western ways for Russian 'moral values'
Putin has decided that Russia is going to be a 'safe haven' for people who want to trade liberal Western ways for Russian 'moral values'
The Foreign Ministry will be offering three-month visas as early as next month, Russian state media said.
![Putin has decided that Russia is going to be a 'safe haven' for people who want to trade liberal Western ways for Russian 'moral values'](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f92b066b-482b-45d9-8ea5-050ce8f08611.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
- Putin has signed a decree that Russia will welcome foreigners who want to escape Western liberal ideals.
- Applicants may include those from countries unaligned with "Russian spiritual and moral values."
- The application process has been simplified, and visas will be issued as soon as next month.
You're viewing a single thread.
That would be a sideways move.
Changing from one oligarchy to another oligarchy.
Well, if you become a whistleblower or if you are a journalist that the west wants to arrest, or get rid of, that might be your best bet.
Edward Snowden is alive and kicking.
8 27 ReplyI dunno, seems like there’s a significantly higher chance of falling from a window and dying in Russia
27 0 ReplyAs an American, I know about our regime-change wars and about our military leaks, including some of our real civilian causalities in our forever wars.
Not to mention our civil rights activists keep dying, as well as other information about the three letter agencies.
I try to avoid races to the bottom, especially when comparing citizen deaths in the US and Russia.
It will not make any nation more popular.
4 20 ReplyAs an American
[X] Doubt
14 1 ReplyNo Doubt is a great band.
As an American
I add that due to encounters with non-Americans.
We are strangers on the internet; feel free to think what you will, I will not try to force it on you, hahaha.
3 11 Reply
Edward Snowden is alive and kicking.
Alexei Navalny isn't. I wonder what the difference could be?
9 1 ReplyChelsea Manning isn’t even in prison anymore.
5 1 ReplyShe never should have been.
2 0 ReplyThat's a different issue. The point was if she had done it in Russia, not only would she not have been allowed to transition, she'd be dead.
1 0 ReplyThat’s a different issue. The point was if she had done it in Russia, not only would she not have been allowed to transition, she’d be dead.
The person to whom I responded wrote:
Chelsea Manning isn’t even in prison anymore.
Which is not at all the same thing as what you are saying.
1 0 ReplyThat is why Chelsea Manning was brought up. Because if she had done what she did in Russia, she would have been murdered by the state for doing it.
1 0 Reply
I wonder what the difference could be?
Actually, it's pretty simple. Edward Snowden exposed government surveillance and ran away, seeking asylum to protect himself after revealing what he believed was in the public's interest. Navalny, on the other hand, wasn’t motivated by public interest—he actively betrayed his country, aligning with foreign interests and openly opposing the government. Unlike Snowden, who wisely fled, Navalny stayed behind like an imbecile. And guess what happens to traitors in Russia? It’s not like in the US, where all that matters is money, fast food, and the latest social media trends—Russia doesn’t mess around when it comes to nationalism.
2 10 Reply
Snowden never wanted to be in Russia. He was trapped there inadvertently by diplomats.
4 0 Replythis is just rebranding oligarchy in a way thats palatable to religious whackjobs, like US conservatives.
6 0 Replyrebranding oligarchy
How? The billionaires and corporations own the most important resources while having great influence over our elections and politicians.
We are only a republic or a "democracy" in our dreams, but in reality, we are also already a fascist country with our police state.
Not to mention the Patriot Act and the many more policies that follow.
The USA PATRIOT Act was a landmark Act of the United States Congress, signed into law by President George W. Bush.
3 7 Replynothing youve said here negates my point. these kinds of messages arent meant for people paying attention.
im not disagreeing with you. rebranding is all about optics, and attempting to change peoples view of something... often a terrible thing.
7 0 ReplyInteresting! Thanks for expanding on your thoughts a bit!
4 3 Reply