5th Circuit finds Biden White House, CDC violated First Amendment
5th Circuit finds Biden White House, CDC violated First Amendment
The judges wrote that the White House, the Surgeon General, the CDC and the FBI likely “coerced the platforms to make their moderation decisions by way of intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences.”
The 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Friday ruled that the Biden White House, top government health officials and the FBI likely violated the First Amendment by improperly influencing tech companies’ decisions to remove or suppress posts on covid-19 and elections.
The decision is largely a victory for conservatives who’ve long argued that social media platforms’ content moderation efforts restrict their free speech rights.
The judges’ decision modifies a lower court’s injunction, barring some government officials in the White House and FBI from coercing social media platforms to take down or otherwise limit posts on their website. The ruling, written by three judges appointed by Republican presidents, comes after the 5th Circuit temporarily blocked an order that had put wide ranging restrictions on the Biden administration’s communications with social media firms. That order had included a wider range of government agencies, including the departments of Health and Human Services, State and Homeland Security as well as the U.S. Census Bureau. The 5th Circuit removed them.
The judges wrote that the White House likely “coerced the platforms to make their moderation decisions by way of intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences.” They also found the White House “significantly encouraged the platforms’ decisions by commandeering their decision-making processes, both in violation of the First Amendment.”
The decision is likely to have a wide-ranging impact on how the federal government communicates with the public about key public health issues and the 2024 elections.
The appeals court judges found that pressure from the White House and the CDC affected how social media platforms handled posts about covid-19 in 2021, as the Biden administration sought to encourage the public to obtain vaccinations.
The judges also zeroed in on the FBI’s communications with tech platforms in the run-up to the 2020 elections, which included regular meetings with the tech companies. The judges wrote that the FBI’s activities were “not limited to purely foreign threats," citing instances where the law enforcement agency “targeted” posts that originated inside the United States, including some that stated incorrect poll hours or mail-in voting procedures.
The Biden White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Any appeal of the order could bring the debate over online speech before the Supreme Court, which is expected to take up conflicting appeals court rulings over state social media laws this year.
The decision limited the scope of the lower court’s injunction, which had applied to a wide swath of of officials across the administration. The new order applies only to the White House, the surgeon general, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FBI.
The lower court’s order had specifically named leaders working at DHS, HHS and other agencies exempted by the 5th Circuit, and the judges on Friday said many of those individuals “were permissibly exercising government speech.”
“That distinction is important because the state-action doctrine is vitally important to our Nation’s operation — by distinguishing between the state and the People, it promotes ‘a robust sphere of individual liberty,’” the 5th Circuit judges wrote.
This is such a shit show.
The ruling, written by three judges appointed by Republican presidents, comes after the 5th Circuit temporarily blocked an order that had put wide ranging restrictions on the Biden administration’s communications with social media firms. That order had included a wider range of government agencies, including the departments of Health and Human Services, State and Homeland Security as well as the U.S. Census Bureau. The 5th Circuit removed them.
Our democracy was not built to handle the 21st century technologies. lol
Of course the fifth circuit ruled against Biden it's the most conservative court circuit in the country.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
What law did Congress pass here? The government asking social media companies to stop the spread of dangerous misinformation about a pandemic is in no way a violation of the First Amendment as written. Of course, conservatives will twist words to mean whatever the hell they want in order to achieve their desired outcome. The 5th circuit is just as much of a joke as the supreme court.
Social media was a vector for lies about Covid 19 and vaccines. Social media and right wing posters was a cause of so many deaths from Covid 19. I personally know people who got their information from Social media about Covid/vaccines and refused to get vaccinated. One is dead now because he got Covid. Other almost died at home because she got Covid and didn't have health insurance. She waited until she was about to die before having to call the ambulance to take her to the hospital--she has no health insurance. She now has a huge hospital bill she can never afford to pay. Both these people listen to Social media lies about the vaccines (government tackers, changing people's DNA) and how Covid wasn't real. They told me this. The vaccine was free to everyone.
Lies about the election being stolen caused more people to die. There are a lot of people who believe anything they read on the internet. They don't know how to critically think and be skeptical about what they are reading. And the Republicans know this and know that using social media to lie is effective to stay in power.
Stop voting for Republicans, they don't believe in our democracy and they use social media to lie and get people killed.
I don't...hate this. The majority of the original ruling got overturned, and the parts that remain...I kind of prefer the courts overreact to. Like in THIS INSTANCE I certainly think SOMEONE should be pushing back on people spreading misinformation about voting, but the argument is that if the FBI is meeting with tech companies to stop people from saying certain things, they need to be very careful, and these judges think they weren't careful enough.
Companies will always defer to law enforcement because it's metaphorically (and probably literally in some cases) like getting a suggestion from a guy holding a gun. Even if you don't agree, this person could make your life a lot worse and that implication of a threat is a big deal and it's very easy to see how that gets to censorship of truthful things, which is what we actually want to prevent.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Friday ruled that the Biden White House, top government health officials and the FBI likely violated the First Amendment by improperly influencing tech companies’ decisions to remove or suppress posts on covid-19 and elections.
The decision is largely a victory for conservatives who’ve long argued that social media platforms’ content moderation efforts restrict their free speech rights.
The judges’ decision modifies a lower court’s injunction, barring some government officials in the White House and FBI from coercing social media platforms to take down or otherwise limit posts on their website.
The ruling, written by three judges appointed by Republican presidents, comes after the 5th Circuit temporarily blocked an order that had put wide ranging restrictions on the Biden administration’s communications with social media firms.
The appeals court judges found that pressure from the White House and the CDC affected how social media platforms handled posts about covid-19 in 2021, as the Biden administration sought to encourage the public to obtain vaccinations.
The lower court’s order had specifically named leaders working at DHS, HHS and other agencies exempted by the 5th Circuit, and the judges on Friday said many of those individuals “were permissibly exercising government speech.”
The original article contains 522 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
How much will the fine be?