2 or 3, depends on whether the spider wants to wear high waist or low waist pants.
16 0 ReplyI prefer to see 1. But logic would be a 2 imo
8 0 ReplyAs an arachnaphobe, somehow makes them much more tolerable
6 0 ReplyI feel like we need c/humansdrawingspiders.
4 0 ReplyMore pantsbrained trouserganda. Where does the madness end?
4 0 ReplyPants are the shackles of the patriarchy
5 0 Reply
how would HE wear ITS pants
3 0 ReplyWell, I'm French so to me every spider is a she!
2 0 ReplyFunny, I call them Greg.
2 0 Reply
if the illustrations were drawn correctly, the response would be 1
2 0 ReplyQuelqu'un avait déjà fait cette remarque dans le post d'origine. Je n'en attendais pas moins de !spiders@lemmy.world
4 0 ReplyYeah, but it should be the 4 back legs, not just the 2
Equal hands and feet
1 1 Reply
Back four legs and bottom half of the butt covered
2 0 ReplyI dunno why but this gives me generic dad vibes lol
2 0 ReplyThe first two ones won't work because spider legs don't attach at the abdomen.
2 0 ReplyShould we try with a dress then?
4 0 ReplyI have never imagined that before. So thanks for that.
2 0 Reply
I think we can all agree that three is absolute collyswaddle and should be discounted going forward.
1 0 ReplyMaybe but you will have to explain me what collyswaddle means first.
1 0 Reply
But... why?
1 1 ReplyWhy not?
1 0 ReplyI see spiders more in the long and colourful stockings department.
2 0 Reply